My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:25 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:43:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2007
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2007.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
504
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ci <br />L <br />AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY <br />LABORATORY NARRATIVE <br />Modified TO -14A <br />SCS Field Services <br />Workorder# 0703419 <br />Five 1 Liter Summa Canister samples were received on March 16, 2007. The laboratory performed analysis <br />via modified EPA Method TO -14A using GUMS in the full scan mode. The method involves concentrating <br />up to 0.2 liters of air. The concentrated aliquot is then flash vaporized and swept through a water <br />I <br />management system to remove water vapor. Following dehumidification, the sample passes directly into the <br />GUMS for analysis. <br />t <br />[l <br />r. <br />fl <br />it <br />fi <br />Method modifications taken to run these samples are summarized in the below table. Specific project <br />reauirements may over -ride the ATL modifications. <br />Requirement <br />TO -14A <br />ATL Modifications <br />Daily CCV <br />+- 30% Difference <br /></= 30% Difference with two allowed out up to </=40%.; <br />flag and narrate outliers <br />Initial Calibration criteria <br />RSD<30% <br />RSD</=30%, two compounds allowed up to 40% <br />BFB absolute abundance criteria <br />Within 10% of that <br />from previous day <br />CCV internal standard area counts are compared to ICAL, <br />corrective action for > 40% D <br />Blank acceptance criteria <br /><0.20 ppbv <br /><Reporting Limit <br />Moisture control <br />Nafion Dryer <br />Multisorbent trap <br />Sample collection media <br />Summa canister <br />ATL recommends use of summa canisters to insure data <br />defensibility, but will report results from Tedlar bags at <br />client request <br />Receiving Notes <br />There were no receiving discrepancies. <br />Analytical Notes <br />All Quality Control Limit failures and affected sample results are noted by flags. Each flag is defined at the <br />bottom of this Case Narrative and on each Sample Result Summary page. <br />Definition of Data Qualifying Flags <br />Eight qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows: <br />B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting linut (background subtraction no, <br />performed). <br />J - Estimated value. <br />E - Exceeds instrument calibration range. <br />S - Saturated peak. <br />Q - Exceeds quality control limits. <br />U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the reporting limit <br />UJ- Non-detected compound associated with low bias in the CCV <br />Page 2 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.