Laserfiche WebLink
' ANNUAL SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater <br /> ' General Water Quality Parameters <br /> The following is based on use of data from crossgradient well MW-1 as if it were upgradient. As <br /> previously noted, exceedences for sulfate and bicarbonate are reported by Sanitas software under <br /> these circumstances, but are apparently not valid based on evaluation of historic data. <br /> ' Additional data from new background well MW-4 will provide new tolerance limits for all <br /> parameters, including sulfate and bicarbonate. Until sufficient data from MW-4 is available for <br /> that analysis, conclusions regarding possible groundwater impacts will be based on review of the <br /> data. <br /> The following "exceedences" are therefore considered invalid and do not indicate water quality <br /> impact from landfill activities. <br /> Monitoring data shows that all constituents were within interwell tolerance limits except for: <br /> ' • Well MW-1: Bicarbonate was recorded at 130 mg/L in first semester exceeded the <br /> tolerance limit of 110 mg/1. <br /> ' • Well MW-2R: Bicarbonate was recorded at 150 mg/L in first semester exceeded the <br /> tolerance limit of 110 mg/l. <br /> ' • Well MW-3: Bicarbonate was recorded at 130 mg/L in second semester exceeded the <br /> tolerance limit of 110 mg/L. <br /> • Well MW-4: Sulfate was recorded at 9.88 mg/L and 9.6 mg/l in the first and second <br /> ' semesters, respectively, exceeded the tolerance limit of 8.9 mg/l and 8.8 mg/1 <br /> respectively. Bicarbonate was recorded at 150 mg/L and 130 mg/l in first and second <br /> semesters, respectively, exceeded the tolerance limit of 110 mg/L. <br /> • Well MW-5: Sulfate was recorded at 9.93 mg/L and 9.99 mg/L in the first and second <br /> semesters, respectively,exceeded the tolerance limit of 8.9 mg/L and 8.8 mg/L <br /> respectively. Bicarbonate was recorded at 130 mg/L during the first and second <br /> semesters exceeded the tolerance limit of 110 mg/L. <br /> It also should be noted that sulfate concentrations in the Foothill Landfill wells (approximately 10 <br /> mg/L or less) are far below the secondary maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 250 mg/L, <br /> indicating good water quality. There is no MCL for bicarbonate alkalinity. <br /> VOCs <br /> ' Two VOCs (1,1-Dichloroethene and Acetone) were reported in samples collected from well <br /> MW-2R on July 29, 2008, but were not reported in this well when re-sampled on August 28, 2008; <br /> therefore, the first reports were erroneous, probably due to laboratory contamination. Other than <br /> those false positives, VOCs were not detected in any wells during the first and second semester <br /> 2008 sampling events, and have not been confirmed in any well since October 2001. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill j 1 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2'd Semester and Annual 2008 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 31,2009 <br />