Laserfiche WebLink
Above the water-bearing zone, the soil layers are moderately to well-cemented layers of sandstone <br /> and siltstone with claystone and conglomerates. This soil is mostly moderately slow in <br /> permeability with sporadic sandy layers that are well drained. <br /> Construction <br /> Module "I" is an unlined module covering approximately 80 acres. <br /> Module 1 was completed in December 2003. It covers approximately 34 acres with composite <br /> liner conforming to RCRA Subtitle D and CCR Title 27 as follows (from top to bottom): <br /> • 2-foot-thick soil operations layer <br /> • 8 oz/synthetic nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • Drainage layer: <br /> — Base: 0.75-foot-thick gravel drainage layer with leachate collection troughs with <br /> 4-inch-diameter piping <br /> — Side slopes: geocomposite drain layer with nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • 60-mil HDPE geomembrane <br /> • Geosynthetic clay liner(GCL) on prepared surface <br /> • 1-foot thick prepared subgrade (base only). <br /> COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br /> Prior to March 2000, the landfill was found not to impact groundwater. From March 2000 to <br /> October 2001, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were repeatedly detected at a single <br /> groundwater monitoring well, MW-3. These detections have been ascribed to ponding along a <br /> road on refuse immediately adjacent to that monitoring well during the winters of 1995/1996, <br /> 1996/1997, and 1997/1998. Impact to groundwater at other wells was not indicated. <br /> In the spring of 1998,covering with refuse and grading corrected ponding. However, penetration <br /> of water into the refuse below the ponding area apparently caused an increase in landfill gas (LFG) <br /> production in the years after ponding was corrected, sufficient to impact the groundwater. <br /> Correction of the ponding has since allowed the LFG production to dissipate, and groundwater <br /> contamination has not been confirmed in MW-3 since October 2002 (over six years). <br /> Contamination has not been confirmed at other groundwater monitoring wells at any time. <br /> In February 2002, water samples from MW-3 indicated that impact to groundwater had ceased. <br /> Except for"false positive" detections due to laboratory contamination, impact to groundwater has <br /> not been indicated at this well since that time. Groundwater impact at the other wells by VOCs <br /> has not been indicated since the wells were installed. <br /> On November 6, 2002, the County submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Plan proposing methods to <br /> delineate the nature and extent of groundwater impact seen at MW-3. The Plan included drilling <br /> and sampling from temporary borings, and a step-out step-down approach if groundwater <br /> contamination was detected at those borings. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2"d Semester and Annual 2008 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 31,2009 <br />