Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dan Johnson <br />February 11, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />On January 22, 2009, as requested by site personnel, SCS performed testing of LFG Evaluation <br />Monitoring Probe No. SG -11 (see Table 1). Results indicted that methane gas concentrations of <br />up to 6.7 percent by volume were detected. Note that Probe No. SG -11 has exhibited <br />fluctuating levels of methane gas and is intended for on-site subsurface evaluation purposes <br />and is not a regulatory compliance location. <br />Additionally, as required semiannually by Waste Discharge Requirements R5-01-176, soil pore <br />gas samples were collected on January 22, 2009, from designated perimeter monitoring probes and <br />analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOC's) utilizing the Modified Method TO -14A. The <br />results of these analyses will be submitted separately in our First Quarter 2009 Perimeter Probe <br />Monitoring report. The next required testing shall be performed during the third quarter 2009. <br />ON-SITE INTERIOR STRUCTURE TESTING <br />In accordance with the approved testing schedule, the interiors of on-site structures are to be tested <br />at a minimum, on a quarterly basis. As previously reported during October 2008, all on-site <br />structures (i.e., scalehouse, maintenance building, manager's residence, and south residence) were <br />tested for the presence of methane gas. In each structure, random selected locations (i.e., electrical <br />outlets and junction boxes, conduits, drains, floor cracks, etc.) were tested. Test results indicated <br />no methane gas in excess of 1.25 percent by volume was detected at any location tested. <br />SCS is scheduled to perform first quarter monitoring of 2009 (January through March) of the <br />interiors of on-site structures by the end of the month of March 2009. <br />LFG EXTRACTION WELL TESTING <br />System adjustments are required whenever an extraction well exhibits an unacceptable change in <br />pressure, methane and/or oxygen gas concentration (which could be due to an overpull or <br />underpull condition). Overpull occurs when the extraction rate of a particular extraction well <br />exceeds that of the LFG generation rate within the radius of influence of the well. <br />During this overpull condition, air can be drawn through the ground surface to the extraction <br />well and then ultimately be injected into the flare. If an excessive overpull condition is allowed <br />to continue for a long period, a significant drop in the methane gas content of the LFG and/or a <br />subsurface landfill fire could occur. <br />Underpull occurs when the extraction rate of a particular extraction well is less than the <br />generation rate within the radius of influence of the well. This condition could result in off-site <br />subsurface LFG migration and/or surface emissions. <br />Results of monthly testing and adjusting of accessible LFG interior and perimeter extraction <br />wells performed on January 14 and 22, 2009, (see Table 2) indicated that most extraction wells <br />exhibited an under pull condition. SCS will continue to adjust (utilizing new county adjustment <br />protocols) accessible LFG extraction wells to maintain operational criteria. <br />D <br />