ARCHIVED REPORTS_2008_4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

11 0 it C� CI U u L Ll Ci Inorganic Data Qualifiers The result is an outlier. See case narrative. # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative. B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result. E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded. the instrument calibration range. J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL. U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non -detect") at or above the MRUMDL. i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to a matrix interference. X See case narrative. Metals Data Qualifiers # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative. B The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL. E The percent difference for the serial dilution was greater than 10%, indicating a possible matrix interference in the sample. M The duplicate injection precision was not met. N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative. S The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA). U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("don -detect") at or above the MRLIMDL. W The post -digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike absorbance. i The MRUMDL has been elevated due to a matrix interference. X See case narrative. * The duplicate analysis not within control limits. See case narrative. -I- The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995. Organic Data Qualifiers * The result is an outlier. See case narrative. # The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative. A A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol -condensation product. B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result. C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data. D The reported result is from a dilution. E The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range. J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL. N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not performed. P The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two analytical results (25% for CLP Pesticides). U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Iron -detect') at or above the MRUMDL. i The MRUMDL has been elevated due to a chromatographic interference. X See case narrative. Additional Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific Qualifiers r The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard. L The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but tate elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard. H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard. 0 The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard. ,i, The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the correct carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard. 7 The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product. 33