Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING RESULTS <br /> Sampling and analysis procedures are in Appendix A and the field data sheets are in Appendix B. <br /> The laboratory reports are in Appendix C. <br /> Statistical Analysis <br /> The FSL has been approved to use interwell tolerance limits methods, with an upgradient well <br /> providing background data(Tables 2 & 3). <br /> MW-4 was located directly up-gradient of the landfill based on groundwater elevations from the <br /> previously-installed wells. This well has been sampled six times since installation. Because the <br /> quantity of data from this well is insufficient to establish concentration limits until at least eight <br /> samples are collected, data from MW-1 is used to calculate concentration limits on a provisional <br /> basis. Until sufficient data from MW-4 is available for that analysis, conclusions regarding <br /> possible groundwater impacts from Sanitas software will be tentative, and will be tempered with <br /> review of the data. However, it should be noted that MW-1 was dry and could not be sampled in <br /> the second semester of 2009. Therefore, the reliance on MW-1 as an indicator of background <br /> water quality conditions could lead to false impressions of landfill impact. <br /> Groundwater <br /> Monitoring and Field Parameters <br /> A review of the third and fourth quarter general water quality parameters (Tables 2 & 3) indicates <br /> compliance with concentration limits that were previously derived from MW-1. <br /> Using data from MW-1 to calculate concentration limits can cause false exceedences of <br /> concentration limits for parameters in the site's monitoring wells including new background well <br /> MW-4. A list of provisional exceedences is as follows: <br /> • Sodium detected at a concentration of 17 mg/L during the 3'd quarter sampling event in <br /> well MW-3 slightly exceeded concentration limit of 16 mg/L calculated from MW-1 data. <br /> This provisional exceedence may be false, as MW-1 could not be sampled during this <br /> monitoring period(due to low groundwater elevation) and insufficient data exists for <br /> MW-4 to develop a more appropriate sodium concentration limit. Note that there is no <br /> MCL for sodium. A concentration of 17 mg/L of sodium is considered good water quality. <br /> • Since MW-4 is hydraulically upgradient from the landfill, concentration limits calculated <br /> at side gradient well MW-1 would not apply to this well. Therefore, bicarbonate <br /> concentrations of 140 mg/L at well MW-4 during the P and 4th quarter monitoring are not <br /> a result of impact from the landfill. Note that there is no MCL for bicarbonate alkalinity. <br /> VOCs <br /> Two VOCs were detected in MW-3 during the August 2009 sampling event including a trace <br /> concentration of 0.42 ug/L 1,1-Dicloroethene and 1.0 ug/L Trichloroethene(TCE). None of these <br /> detections exceeded their respective MCLS. 1,1-Dicloroethene was last detected in this well in 1 sc <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 8 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2nd Semester and Annual 2009 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 31,2010 <br />