My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 10:53:35 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:44:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
626
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Surface Water <br /> Surface water samples were taken from the creek flowing along the eastern property boundary <br /> during the first semester 2010. The results of analyses of the upstream and downstream samples <br /> were similar, showing that the surface water contribution to the stream did not degrade the quality <br /> of the stream(Table 4). In fact,the downstream sample had a lower concentration in both total <br /> dissolved solids and electrical conductivity than the upstream sample,possibly indicating that the <br /> surface water from the landfill contributes less to the stream than upstream surface water. <br /> Note that the creek receives contribution from the ground surface and several smaller creeks on <br /> the neighbor's properties east of the creek, and that these surfaces and the creek itself are subject <br /> to cattle grazing. Surface water from these properties also enter the stream, and is included in the <br /> samples taken. <br /> Leachate <br /> Waste Discharge Requirements require monitoring leachate flow rate,pH, and Electrical <br /> Conductivity on a monthly basis (Table 6). Leachate volumetric data for several months indicates <br /> reasonable average flow rates. <br /> Vadose Zone Soil Gas <br /> First Semester Results <br /> Vadose zone soil gasses are generally measured at soil gas wells within the property boundary,not <br /> from perimeter migration monitoring wells. Soil gasses were sampled on February 2, 2010. <br /> Samples were collected by first measuring the methane content using a CES-LANDTEC GEMTM <br /> 500 portable gas analyzer. The GEMTM 500 was operated until a steady-state gas composition <br /> indicated that the well was purged. After purging, gas samples were collected in stainless steel <br /> Summa canisters and sent to Atmospheric Analysis& Consulting, Inc. for analysis by EPA <br /> method TO-14A (Appendix I). <br /> VOCs were detected in all soil gas samples (Table 7). The highest concentration of any VOC was <br /> found in SG-l. Freon 12 was most often reported with the highest concentration in a sample. The <br /> most VOCs (fourteen) were reported in the soil gas trench(sample SG-T1). The source of the <br /> VOCs in the vadose zone is likely the old unlined portion of the landfill. <br /> Methane was detected in three soil gas wells this semester; however,measurement of methane at <br /> the perimeter migration monitoring wells indicates that the facility is compliant with Title 27 <br /> regulations for off-site migration. <br /> VOCs have been detected in soil gas since monitoring began in October 2003,but VOC impact to <br /> groundwater has only been sporadic with diminished detections since February 2002. The <br /> sporadic detection of VOCs in groundwater indicates that the presence of VOCs in the soil at these <br /> concentrations is not a significant condition at this landfill. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill g Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1S`Semester 2010 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 21,2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.