My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_4
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAVERLY
>
6484
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440004
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 10:13:34 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:44:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440004
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004517
FACILITY_NAME
FOOTHILL LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
6484
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAVERLY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LINDEN
Zip
95236
APN
09344002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6484 N WAVERLY RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440004_6484 N WAVERLY_2010_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
557
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANNUAL SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater <br /> General Water Quality Parameters <br /> MW-4 was located directly up-gradient of the landfill based on groundwater elevations from the <br /> previously-installed wells. This well has been sampled ten times since installation. Concentration <br /> limits have been established based on Sanitas software calculations using data for MW-4. <br /> The following annual compliance review was prepared for each well: <br /> • Well MW-1:Nitrate was recorded at 3.1 mg/L and 2.0 mg/L in the first and second <br /> semesters which slightly exceeded the tolerance limit of 1.8 mg/L. No other general <br /> water quality parameters were exceeded in this well during either the 1St or 2" semester <br /> 2010 sampling events. <br /> • Well MW-2R: Nitrate was recorded at 2.8 mg/L and 2.9 mg/L in the first and second <br /> semesters which slightly exceeded the tolerance limit of 1.8 mg/L. No other general <br /> water quality parameters were exceeded in this well during either the 1 st or 2nd semester <br /> 2010 sampling events. <br /> • Well MW-3: Nitrate was recorded at 2.8 mg/L and 2.9 mg/L in the first and second <br /> semesters which slightly exceeded the tolerance limit of 1.8 mg/L. Carbonate <br /> Alkalinity was recorded at 3.1 mg/L in the first semester which slightly exceeded the <br /> tolerance limit of 2.5 mg/L. Carbonate Alkalinity is generally non-detect in the site <br /> wells and leachate. The species of Alkalinity generally present in groundwater at the <br /> site,Bicarbonate Alkalinity was less than the concentration limit in all wells. Since <br /> there is no maximum contaminant level for this parameter and the detected <br /> concentration was low,this detection is not considered an impact on water quality. No <br /> other general water quality parameters were exceeded in this well during either the 1 st <br /> or 2nd semester 2010 sampling events. <br /> • Well MW-4: No General water quality parameters were exceeded during either the 1st <br /> or 2nd semester 2010 sampling events. <br /> • Well MW-5: Nitrate was recorded at 1.9 mg/L in the second semester which slightly <br /> exceeded the tolerance limit of 1.8 mg/L. No other general water quality parameters <br /> were exceeded in this well during either the lst or 2nd semester 2010 sampling events. <br /> VOCs <br /> One VOC (Toluene)was reported in samples collected from well MW-1 during the 1st semester <br /> sampling and the retest that followed. One VOC(Trichloroethene) was reported in samples <br /> collected from well MW-3 during the 2nd semester sampling and the retest that followed. These <br /> detections will continue to be scrutinized in the future. <br /> Due to the size of the pipes serving the LFG wells in the western part of the landfill(near MW-3), <br /> it is likely that LFG is not adequately collected from that portion of the landfill. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 13 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2"d Semester and Annual 2010 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 31,2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.