Laserfiche WebLink
By February 2007, five years after VOCs ceased to be detected at MW-3, construction of the Site <br /> Improvement Project was substantially complete; however,the vegetation in the evapotranspirative(ET) <br /> ® closure was not well established. Further work was needed to establish the vegetation. <br /> This project also included a barrier between existing Module "I"refuse and new refuse. At the direction of <br /> RWQCB staff,this barrier was a gas-tight barrier equivalent to a barrier required beneath refuse to protect <br /> groundwater. <br /> In November 2007,the ET area was again reseeded,but growth remained insufficient for adequate ET cover. <br /> In November 2008,the closure cap soil was amended and fertilized, and again seeded. <br /> In the spring of 2009, vegetation was growing healthily on the ET cap area. <br /> On June 10, 2009, CVRWQCB staff issued a notice of violation for discharge of wastes outside of <br /> containment due to the presence of VOCs in the soil within County property. <br /> On March 4,2009, San Joaquin County staff noticed that the landfill gas(LFG) condensate pump discharge <br /> was connected to the secondary leachate sump of Module 1. <br /> In April 2009,the LFG condensate was removed from the secondary sump, and the soil gas trench(installed <br /> beneath the liner of Module 1)was activated to enhance the protection of groundwater. <br /> An investigation in October 2009 indicated that the condensate had been forced between the primary and <br /> secondary liner up the side of the landfill, and had been discharged into the anchor trench along the side of <br /> the landfill where the primary and secondary liners terminate, a few feet below ground surface. Monitoring <br /> of the secondary sump, and removal of condensate remaining in the secondary sump as it becomes available <br /> to pump, continues on a monthly basis. <br /> In March 2011,the continuing removal of liquid from the secondary sump, including increased removal <br /> during a high-water level event in the primary sump,indicated hydraulic communication between the <br /> primary and secondary sump. The County proposed to install automatic pump in the secondary sump to <br /> maintain the liquid head above the liner below 12", in accordance with CC Title 27. <br /> VOCs were again confirmed in MW-3 in the first quarter 2011. No other well indicates impact. <br /> In considering the timeline of detections and corrective actions, a four or five year lag between action and <br /> result may be apparent: <br /> • Winter of 1995/96 and continuing through three winters: water ponded over refuse near MW-3 <br /> • 1998:ponding corrected <br /> • March 2001 (five years after the start of ponding): VOCs indicated at MW-3 <br /> ® February 2002 (four years after ponding was corrected): VOC impact is no longer seen at MW-3 <br /> • 2002 to 2006: MW-3 is free of VOCs without a LFG system in operation <br /> • 2006: Site Improvement Project executed, including a installing a LFG system and a gas-tight HDPE <br /> ® "liner"over refuse <br /> • July 2007: Landfill gas system operates near-continuously <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 4 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1s`Semester 2011 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2011 <br />