Laserfiche WebLink
Construction <br /> Module"I"is an unlined module covering approximately 80 acres. <br /> Module 1 is provided with composite liner conforming to RCRA Subtitle D and CCR Title 27 as follows <br /> (from top to bottom): <br /> • 2-foot-thick soil operations layer <br /> • 8 oz/synthetic nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • Drainage layer: <br /> — Base: 0.75-foot-thick gravel drainage layer with leachate collection troughs with <br /> 4-inch-diameter piping <br /> — Side slopes: geocomposite drain layer with nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • 60-mil HDPE geomembrane <br /> • Geosynthetic clay liner(GCL) on prepared surface <br /> • 1-foot thick prepared subgrade (base only). <br /> Module lwas constructed in two phases. The first phase of approximately 34 acres was completed in 2003. <br /> The second phase of approximately six acres was completed in 2006. A portion of the liner installed in this <br /> phase was placed over refuse of Module "I".. <br /> COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br /> Prior to March 2000, the landfill was found not to impact groundwater. From March 2000 to October 2001, <br /> volatile organic compounds(VOCs)were detected at a single groundwater monitoring well,MW-3. These <br /> detections have been ascribed to ponding on refuse along a road immediately adjacent to that monitoring <br /> well during the winters of 1995/1996, 1996/1997, and 1997/1998. Impact to groundwater at other wells was <br /> not indicated. <br /> In the spring of 1998, covering of the refuse and grading the area corrected the ponding. However, <br /> penetration of water into the refuse below the ponding area apparently caused an increase in landfill gas <br /> (LFG)production in the years after ponding was corrected, sufficient to impact the groundwater. Correction <br /> of the ponding has allowed the LFG production to dissipate, and groundwater contamination was not <br /> confirmed in MW-3 for a long time period. <br /> In February 2002, water samples from MW-3 indicated that impact to groundwater had ceased. Except for <br /> "false positive"detections due to laboratory contamination, impact to groundwater has not been indicated at <br /> this well since that time. Contamination has not been confirmed at other groundwater monitoring wells at <br /> any time. <br /> On November 6, 2002, nine months after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3,the County submitted an <br /> Evaluation Monitoring Plan at the requirement of RWQCB staff. This Plan proposed methods to delineate <br /> the nature and extent of groundwater impact previously seen at MW-3, as required. The Plan included <br /> drilling and sampling from temporary borings, and a step-out step-down approach if groundwater <br /> contamination was detected at those borings. <br /> isOn January 30, 2003, eleven months after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3,the California Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region(CVRWQCB), issued WDRs. These WDRs required <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1"Semester 2011 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2011 <br />