Laserfiche WebLink
VOCs <br /> ' One VOC (Trichloroethene) was reported in samples collected from well MW-3 during the 1St semester <br /> 2013. VOCs were not detected in any wells in the 2nd Semester 2013 . These detections will continue to be <br /> scrutinized in the future. As previously described, the County suspects that this new detection of VOCs at <br /> MW-3 is related to the placement of a gas-tight HDPE membrane over Area"I"refuse. VOCs were not <br /> detected in any other well during 2013. <br /> t The County continues to be concerned that installation of impermeable liner over refuse decreases the <br /> potential venting of LFG in spite of the presence of a LFG collection system. Sealing the refuse from the air <br /> can increase the potential for contamination of groundwater by LFG entering the soil beneath the landfill. <br /> Storm Water <br /> Storm water was not sampled during 2013 due to lack of precipitation. Storm water was last sampled from <br /> discharge points SW-UP and SW-DWN in Second Semester 2012 (Appendix Q. Results were <br /> unremarkable. <br /> Surface Water <br /> ' Surface water was not sampled during 2013 due to lack of precipitation. Surface water samples were last <br /> collected in the 2nd Semester 2012. The results of previous analyses of the upstream and downstream <br /> samples were similar, showing that the surface water contribution to the stream did not degrade the quality of <br /> the stream. <br /> Note that the creek receives contribution from the ground surface and several smaller creeks from the <br /> neighboring properties east of the creek, and that these surfaces and the creek itself are subject to cattle <br /> grazing (and defecation). Surface water from these adjacent properties also enters the stream, carrying <br /> residue from the cattle, and is included in the samples taken. <br /> HISTORICAL TIME SERIES PLOTS AND STIFF DIAGRAMS <br /> ' Historical Time Series Plots are included with this report on CD. Note that constituents that are not detected <br /> are plotted at a value of half their respective detection limits. Outliers were included in all plots as directed <br /> by RWQCB staff. <br /> Stiff diagrams are submitted annually with the second semester and annual report. The stiff diagrams <br /> submitted for the first and second semesters indicate a calcium-bicarbonate water type since these ions have <br /> the highest concentrations in the six wells (included with this report on CD). The water type is similar in all <br /> wells as indicated by similarity in concentrations of the various constituents and the similarity in diagram <br /> shapes. This similarity indicates that the groundwater is not impacted as it moves under the landfill. The <br /> shapes of the diagrams between the first and second semesters are also very similar, indicating that the <br /> ' general groundwater quality has not changed throughout the year, which is also an indication of no impact <br /> from the landfill. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 12 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> ' 2nd Semester and Annual 2013 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 31,2014 <br />