Laserfiche WebLink
• Well MW-3: No General water quality parameters were exceeded during either the 1St or 2nd <br /> semester 2012 sampling events. <br /> • Well MW-4: No General water quality parameters were exceeded during the 1St semester 2012 <br /> sampling event. Turbidity was recorded at 67.9 NTU which slightly exceeded the tolerance limit <br /> of 65 NTU during the 2nd Semester 2012 sampling event. However,turbidity is an indicator of <br /> well function and not an indicator of landfill impact to groundwater. <br /> • Well MW-5: No General water quality parameters were exceeded during either the 1St or 2nd <br /> semester 2012 sampling events. <br /> VOCs <br /> Two VOCs (Trichloroethene, and 1,1-Dichloroethene)were reported in samples collected from well MW-3 <br /> during the 1St semester 2012 . VOCs were not detected in any wells in the 2nd Semester 2012 . These <br /> detections will continue to be scrutinized in the future. As previously described,the County suspects that <br /> this new detection of VOCs at MW-3 is related to the placement of a gas-tight HDPE membrane over Area <br /> "I"refuse. VOCs were not detected in any other well during 2012. <br /> The County continues to be concerned that installation of impermeable liner over refuse decreases the <br /> potential venting of LFG in spite of the presence of a LFG collection system. Sealing the refuse from the air <br /> can increase the potential for contamination of groundwater by LFG entering the soil beneath the landfill. <br /> Storm Water <br /> Storm water was not sampled during the 1St Semester 2012. Storm water was sampled from discharge points <br /> SW-UP and SW-DWN in Second Semester 2012 (Appendix Q. Results were unremarkable. <br /> Surface Water <br /> Surface water samples were collected in the 2nd Semester 2012 . . The results of previous analyses of the <br /> upstream and downstream samples were similar, showing that the surface water contribution to the stream <br /> did not degrade the quality of the stream. <br /> Note that the creek receives contribution from the ground surface and several smaller creeks from the <br /> neighboring properties east of the creek, and that these surfaces and the creek itself are subject to cattle <br /> grazing(and defecation). Surface water from these adjacent properties also enters the stream, carrying <br /> residue from the cattle, and is included in the samples taken. <br /> HISTORICAL TIME SERIES PLOTS AND STIFF DIAGRAMS <br /> Constituents not detected are plotted at a value of half their respective detection limits in the Historical Time <br /> Series Plots (Appendix F). Outliers were included in the plots as directed by RWQCB staff. <br /> Stiff diagrams are submitted annually with the second semester and annual report. The stiff diagrams <br /> submitted for the first and second semesters indicate a calcium-bicarbonate water type since these ions have <br /> the highest concentrations in the six wells (Appendix F). The water type is similar in all wells as indicated <br /> by similarity in concentrations of the various constituents and the similarity in diagram shapes. This <br /> similarity indicates that the groundwater is not impacted as it moves under the landfill. The shapes of the <br /> diagrams between the first and second semesters are also very similar, indicating that the general <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 12 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2nd Semester and Annual 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 15,2013 <br />