Laserfiche WebLink
The 4 to 5 year response time between surface actions and groundwater impact is consistent with <br /> the relatively deep (200 feet) vadose zone at the site. <br /> Therefore, it is our professional opinion that VOCs driven out of the base of Area"I" are trapped <br /> in the vadose zone. This is because the increased LFG generated by an increase in refuse <br /> moisture due to ponding was corrected in 1998. The new driving force for VOCs must be the <br /> entrapment of LFG beneath the impermeable HDPE barrier. <br /> ENGINEERING FEAST ILI STUDY <br /> The current groundwater well network consists of five wells; upgradient well MW-4 and <br /> downgradient wells MW-IA, MW-2R, MW-3, and MW-5 (Figure 2). The current vadose zone <br /> monitoring network consists of eleven single-probe interior wells SG-1 through SG-11, and 25 <br /> triple-probe perimeter wells, SG-12 and SG-102 through SG-125 (Figure 2). Wells SGA <br /> through SG-I 1 were installed in 2003. Well SG-8, was later abandoned and removed for the <br /> expansion into Area 2. <br /> The NOV required that the EFS shall include the following: <br /> I. A LFG containment plan that provides a time schedule such that landfill gas is no longer <br /> detected migrating beyond the footprint of Area"I", <br /> ' 2. An engineering design for the system enhancements necessary for the ability to prevent <br /> the detections of LFG outside Area"I", <br /> 3. A work plan to reinstall all current soil gas probes (SG-1 through SG-11) such that they <br /> extend throughout the entire vadose zone and monitor, independently the zones of highest <br /> permeability. The Discharger must evaluate the need for multiple probes at different <br /> depths within the same borehole, <br /> ' 4. A work plan to re-install SG-8 as a nested soil gas probe south of future Area 2, <br /> 5. A work plan to install one groundwater monitoring well south-southeast of future Area 2, <br /> and, <br /> 6. A proposed monitoring plan for the landfill gas wells, and collection system. <br /> Each of these requirements are discussed below: <br /> Landfill Gas Containment Schedule <br /> As previously discussed, based on the previous hydrogeological response time between surface <br /> correction actions to LFG migration and the elimination of groundwater impacts, it is our <br /> professional opinion that the current detections of VOCs in groundwater at MW-3 can be <br /> eliminated in 4 to 5 years,provided that the trapped LFG under the impermeable liner is <br /> addressed. <br /> Landfill Gas Containment Design <br /> The following section describes the enhancements to the LFG extraction system that will be <br /> installed in Area"I" as shown on Figure 3. <br /> Three (3) additional LFG extraction wells are proposed. Two LFG extraction wells will be <br /> installed in the waste mass adjacent to both the HDPE liner and MW-3. A third LFG extraction <br /> well will be installed through the HDPE liner. The first two wells will be used to provide an <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 4 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> Engineering Feasibility Study County of San Joaquin—August 2014 <br />