Laserfiche WebLink
Construction <br /> Area"I" is an unlined Area covering approximately 80 acres. <br /> Area 1 is provided with composite liner conforming to RCRA Subtitle D and CCR Title 27 as follows (from <br /> top to bottom): <br /> • 2-foot-thick soil operations layer <br /> • 8 oz/synthetic nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • Drainage layer: <br /> Base: 0.75-foot-thick gravel drainage layer with leachate collection troughs with <br /> 4-inch-diameter piping <br /> — Side slopes: geocomposite drain layer with nonwoven geotextile separator/filter <br /> • 60-mil HDPE geomembrane <br /> • Geosynthetic clay liner(GCL) on prepared surface <br /> • 1-foot thick prepared subgrade (base only). <br /> Area 1 was constructed in two phases. The first phase of approximately 34 acres was completed in 2003. <br /> The second phase of approximately six acres was completed in 2006. A portion of the liner installed in the <br /> second phase was placed over refuse of Area"I" at the request of California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board, Central Valley Region(CVRWQCB) staff. <br /> COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br /> Prior to March 2000,the landfill was found not to impact groundwater. From March 2000 to October 2001, <br /> volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected at a single groundwater monitoring well, MW-3. These <br /> detections have been ascribed to ponding on refuse along a road immediately adjacent to that monitoring <br /> well five years earlier, during the winters of 1995/1996, 1996/1997, and 1997/1998. Impact to groundwater <br /> at other wells was not indicated. <br /> In the spring of 1998,ponding in this area was corrected by covering the refuse and grading the area to drain. <br /> However,penetration of water into the refuse below the ponding area apparently caused an increase in <br /> landfill gas (LFG)production in the years after ponding was corrected, sufficient to impact the groundwater. <br /> Correction of the ponding has allowed the LFG production to dissipate, and groundwater contamination was <br /> not confirmed in MW-3 for a long time period. <br /> In February 2002, approximately four years after correcting the surface ponding, water samples from MW-3 <br /> indicated that impact to groundwater had ceased. Except for"false positive"detections due to laboratory <br /> contamination, impact to groundwater has not been indicated at this well since that time. Contamination has <br /> not been confirmed at other groundwater monitoring wells at any time. <br /> On November 6, 2002, nine months after the last detection of VOCs at MW-3,the County submitted an <br /> Evaluation Monitoring Plan at the requirement of CVRWQCB staff. This Plan proposed methods to <br /> delineate the nature and extent of groundwater impact previously seen at MW-3, as required. The Plan <br /> included drilling and sampling from temporary borings, and a step-out step-down approach if groundwater <br /> contamination was detected at those borings. <br /> Foothill Sanitary Landfill 2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1 t Semester 2014 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2014 <br />