My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 3:39:42 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:49:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2003
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2003.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
generated by a governmental agency. <br /> Question 22: Is a site that is in the process of <br /> placing 4,000 cubic yards of concrete rubble for <br /> reclamation and levee work exempt from <br /> CIWMB C&D regulations (or at least excluded <br /> from the permit process)? CIWMB staff viewed <br /> the site and noted that it looked like piles of <br /> concrete rubble dumped along a creek and that <br /> there were hand painted signs that said <br /> "CONCRETE HERE". The site was open and <br /> unattended. The County Planning and Building <br /> Department prepared and approved a <br /> mitigated negative declaration and issued a <br /> grading permit for the project. <br /> Answer 22: It is assumed that this is not a <br /> project being carried out by a public agency so <br /> the exclusion under 14 CCR 17388.2(x)(6) <br /> does not apply. If a project is accepting type A <br /> inert debris for longer than one year, the site <br /> might qualify as an inert debris engineered fill <br /> operation per 14 CCR 17388.3 under the <br /> enforcement agency notification tier or as an <br /> inert debris type A disposal facility per 14 M <br /> 17388.4 under a registration permit. This <br /> particular project appears to be the <br /> construction of a levee only. It may qualify as <br /> an excluded engineered fill activity under JA <br /> CCR 17388.2(a)(2) if the concrete has been <br /> properly prepared. If the material is not <br /> processed to 2" minimum particle size this <br /> exemption would not apply. Finally, depending <br /> on the specific facts of the project, the site may <br /> not be a disposal site at all or it may be an <br /> illegal disposal site. <br /> Question 23: According to 14 CCR 17380(g), <br /> the regulations do not apply to persons who <br /> generate C&D debris or inert debris in the <br /> course of carrying out construction, <br /> remodeling, repair, demolition or <br /> deconstruction of buildings, roads, and other <br /> structures at the site of the construction work. <br /> Currently, a military base has several <br /> construction projects going on and they <br /> generate surplus lumber as a part of their daily <br /> operations. As part of their recycling program, <br /> all discarded wood/lumber is taken to a site on- <br /> base where it is chipped and ground into wood <br /> mulch. The wood mulch is used on the military <br /> base. Do the regulations exclude a person who <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.