Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County Environmental Heath Department State Focused Inspection Report <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> SWIS#39-AA-0015 <br /> was 15,558.11 tons. It should also be pointed out that the"Stockpile"column for the month of June 2004 read 73.4 tons. If <br /> Forward Landfill is using tarpaulins and covering only half of the active face with treated auto shredder waste the amount of <br /> waste material designated as"Cover Material"seems excessive for one month. <br /> The August 11,2004 18-month inspection report informed the operator that more information was required in order to <br /> determine if the quantity of waste material designated as"Cover Material" is not more than necessary to meet the <br /> performance requirements for the particular daily cover. <br /> To date Forward Landfill has yet to provide documentation regarding the amount of tonnage used for alternative daily cover <br /> at the active face even after several requests by the local enforcement agency. <br /> CIWMB staff's August 11,2004 18-month inspection report also reminded the operator that the new alternative daily cover <br /> regulations took effect on July 23,2004,and that these regulations changed the reporting requirements for each solid waste <br /> facility's Report of Disposal Site Information. The new regulations require,per Title 27,California Code of Regulations, <br /> Section 21600(b)(6)(B),each operator to estimate the range in tons of alternative daily cover materials that are anticipated to <br /> be used,based on waste types,applicable cover to waste volume ratios,applicable density conversion factors and engineering <br /> specifications. <br /> To date Forward Landfill has yet to submit a Solid Waste Facilities Permit application for a Report of Disposal Site <br /> Information amendment estimating the range in tons of alternati,,e daily cover materials that are anticipated to be used,based <br /> on waste types,applicable cover to waste volume ratios,applicable density conversion factors and engineering specifications. <br /> This focused inspection was also conducted as a follow-up to an April 29,2004 meeting with Forward Landfill <br /> representatives,the local enforcement agency and CIWMB staff regarding the use of processed green material that initially <br /> contained food waste as an alternative daily cover. <br /> VIOLATIONS: <br /> A. The inspection identified two violations of Division 30,Public Resources Code,Part 4,Chapter 3. <br /> 1. Section 44004-Significant Change. No operator of a solid waste facility shall make any significant change in the <br /> design or operation of the solid waste facility not authorized by the existing permit,unless the change is approved by the <br /> enforcement agency,and conforms with this division,and all regulations adopted pursuant to this division and the terms <br /> and conditions of the solid waste facilities permit are revised to reflect the change. <br /> During the review of the tonnage reports for Forward Landfill it was noted that on 16 separate occasions the facility <br /> exceeded its maximum permitted daily tonnage of 8,668 tons over a 66 day period(see Table 1). This is a significant <br /> change in facility operations and a violation of Forward Landfill's June 17,2003 Solid Waste Facilities Permit. <br /> Paze 2 of 6 Inspector <br />