Laserfiche WebLink
III. On July 25, 2002, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-10, located a few <br /> feet north of the scale house, was 10%. <br /> IV. In August 2002,Forward, Inc. submitted a Gas Monitoring Probe Working Plan <br /> to this LEA and, subsequently, installed the gas extraction system and the flare <br /> station. <br /> V. On September 6, 2002, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-10, located a few <br /> feet north of the scale house, was less than 5%. <br /> VI. In May 2003, Forward, Inc. had completed the installation of multilevel gas <br /> monitoring probes at the boundaries. The probes were renumbered beginning <br /> with GP-1 at the main gate and the subsequent numbers were toward the south. <br /> VII. On June 27, 2003, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-9 (Nvhich replaces <br /> GP-2), located near the west boundary, was 18 %. This was documented under <br /> the violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of California Code of <br /> Regulation (27CCR). <br /> VIII. On July 29, 2003, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-8 (which replaces <br /> GP-3) and GP-9 (which replaces GP-2),both of which were located near the west <br /> boundary, was 8% and 18 %, respectively. This was documented under the <br /> violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of California Code of <br /> Regulation(27CCR). <br /> IX. On July 30, 2003, The Regensis Group, Contractor, of 2210 South Asuza Avenue, <br /> West Covina, California, submitted a plan to install gas extraction system that <br /> would be connected to the existing flare station. <br /> X. On August 28, 2003, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probes GP-9 (which replaces <br /> GP-2), located near the west boundary,was 37 %. This was documented under <br /> the violation of Gas Control, Section 20919 of Title 27 of California Code of <br /> Regulation(27CCR). <br /> XI. On September 30, 2003, this LEA conducted routine inspection and noted that the <br /> concentration of methane gas in the gas monitoring probe GP-9 (which replaces <br /> GP-2), located near the west boundary,was 37%. This was documented under the <br /> violation of Explosive Gases Control, Section 20919.5 of 27CCR. <br /> Amended Notice and Order 03-01 Page 2 of 6 Forward Landfill <br /> February 2,2004 <br />