Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County Environmental Heath Department State Focused Inspection Reports <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> SWIS#39-AA-0015 <br /> (d)The owner or operator shall maintain a record of beneficial reuse in accordance with Title 14,California Code of <br /> 41 Regulations,section 18800 et seq.The records shall be available for inspection by authorized representatives of the <br /> enforcement agency,the local health agency,and the CIWMB during normal business hours and retained in the <br /> operating record near the site or in an alternative location approved by the enforcement agency." <br /> During the review of the tonnage reports for Forward Landfill it was noted that 9,726.03 tons of waste was identified as <br /> beneficial reuse over four days from March 7,2005 through March 10,2005 and an additional 10,649.26 tons of waste <br /> was identified as beneficial reuse over four days from February 22,2005 through February 25,2005. <br /> Forward Representatives should provide the local enforcement agency and CIWMB staff information that clarifies how <br /> this beneficial reuse material was used to avoid a finding of overuse of solid waste as beneficially reused. <br /> As stated in Section 20686(b)above,"should the CIWMB determine that an owner or operator violated this standard,the <br /> owner or operator shall revise the applicable reports to reflect the overuse as disposal,and pay the required Board of <br /> Equalization disposal tipping fees for the amount of overuse." <br /> This regulation(Section 20686—Beneficial Reuse)also requires alternative daily cover reuse to comply with the <br /> requirements of Section 20690. Section 20690(a)(7)states that"waste derived materials used as alternative daily cover <br /> shall be restricted to quantities no more than necessary to meet the performance requirements of this section. Should the <br /> CIWMB determine after consulting with the enforcement agency that an owner or operator violated this standard,the <br /> owner or operator shall revise the applicable reports to reflect the overuse as disposal,and pay the required Board of <br /> Equalization disposal tipping fees for the amount of overuse." <br /> During the review of the tonnage reports for Forward Landfill it was noted that on 28 separate occasions the facility had <br /> a refuse to cover ratio of approximately 3:1 or less over a 66 day period. This is in conflict with Forward Landfill's <br /> Report of Disposal Site Information which states that the refuse to cover ratio is 6:1. <br /> Per the regulations,Forward Representatives need to provide the local enforcement agency and CIWMB staff <br /> information that clarifies the use of cover material at Forward Landfill. <br /> 2. Section 20690(a)(5)—Alternative Daily Cover—General Requirements. This section states,in part,that the"owner <br /> or operator shall maintain a record of waste derived alternative daily cover in accordance with Title 14,California Code <br /> of Regulations,Section 18800 et.seq.The records shall be available for inspection by authorized representatives of the <br /> enforcement agency,the local health agency,and the CIWMB during normal business hours and retained in the <br /> operating record near the site or in an alternative location approved by the enforcement agency." <br /> Per a review of several months worth of Daily Cover Certification records used by Forward Landfill it was noted that <br /> each record indicated that green waste alternative daily cover or a combination of green waste alternative daily cover and <br /> tarpaulins were used on a regular basis. However,on the day of the inspection the working face was covered with <br /> treated auto shredder waste and Forward Landfill representatives indicated that treated auto shredder waste had been <br /> used frequently over the past several months. When asked why the Daily Cover Certification records did not indicate <br /> any use of treated auto shredder waste local enforcement agency staff and CIWMB staff were told that site personnel <br /> probably just fill out the form the same way every day. If the records provided do indeed misrepresent what was actually <br /> occurring at the site during the period reviewed,this area of concern could be noted as a violation. <br /> COMMENTS: <br /> The only tonnage records immediately available for review at the focused inspection were from February 1,2005 <br /> through April 18,2005. Forward Representatives stated that they would send the remaining inspections reports covering <br /> a one year period(April 20,2004 through January 31,2005)via the Federal Express delivery service. At the time this <br /> inspection report was mailed,May 4,2005,CIWMB staff had not received the requested tonnage records. <br /> Page 6 of 6 Inspector <br />