Laserfiche WebLink
Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> F Lom: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> qPt: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:21 AM <br /> 'Curt.Fujii@awin.com' <br /> Cc: 'kkennedy@ciwmb.ca.gov' <br /> Subject: FW: <br /> Inorganics_Ciass-II <br /> I_Limits.pd... <br /> Curt, as we discussed during the meeting the soil that would qualify as soil <br /> to be brought in above the tonnage cap would be only clean soil. You drafted a letter and <br /> forwarded that to me. In the letter you state that there are no levels set for other <br /> metals and that you would use them throughout the facility as beneficial reuse. The RWQCB <br /> provided this list and I would like it to be incorporated into your letter. During the <br /> meeting @ the CIWMB. I stated that the clean soils could not be soils that are considered <br /> Class II. You stated that they are not. Please let me know what you think. Robert <br /> The meeting on the 21st is here and how about 10:00 am. Thanks Robert <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Ross Atkinson [mailto:ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 2:51 PM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: Re: <br /> Robert - <br /> 0 ached is a table Jon Marshack worked up about a year ago with designated waste levels <br /> m WET test data. Forward has 30 feet or so to groundwater and clay rich soils (better <br /> than average attenuation) so use the 'High' column for designated levels based on degree <br /> of attenuation. Hope this helps. <br /> Ross <br /> Ross Atkinson <br /> Associate Engineering Geologist <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> Central Valley RWQCB - Sacramento <br /> ph. (916) 464-4614 <br /> email: ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov <br /> >>> "Robert McClellon [EH] " <RMcClellon@sjcehd.com> 09/28/2005 11:06 AM >>> <br /> Ross, please review and comment. The EHD and The CIWMB staff are trying to determine how <br /> clean is clean. The letter references metals with soluble concentrations up to hazardous <br /> waste levels being used through the facility. I was wondering is that ok with you folks, <br /> or are you concerned with other metals such as Arsenic below hazardous levels and would <br /> they be considered designated waste. Thanks Robert <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Ross Atkinson [mailto:ratkinson@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:37 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: Santa Fe Road Landfill <br /> 0 ert <br /> for and I got together and put our concerns into a letter. The draft letter is <br /> attached, please take a look and tell me if it is consistent with the County's concerns. <br /> Thanks <br /> 1 <br />