My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_4
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2022 3:00:48 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:50:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2005_4 N&O 03-01+
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2005_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
812
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Class III Landfill Waste Acceptance -2- 3 November 1988 <br /> For wastes classified as non-hazardous under Title 22, you must additionally acquire sufficient <br /> information to establish that the waste is not a `designated waste' under Section 2522 e 20210 of Title 27 <br /> Subehapter 1 S. Under this section of the regulations, a non-hazardous waste is a `designated <br /> waste' if it"consists of or contains pollutants which, under ambient environmental conditions at <br /> the waste management unit, could be released at concentrations in excess of applicable water <br /> quality objectives, or which could cause degradation of waters of the state." Determination that a <br /> waste is not a `designated waste' under this definition involves the following steps: <br /> 1) Determine which bodies of water could be affected should waste or leachate migrate from the <br /> WMU. The Findings of your WDRs should name these water bodies. <br /> 2) Determine the existing and probable future beneficial uses of these waters, as defined by the <br /> Water Quality Control Plan Report(Basin Plan). Usually, it is safe to assume that the most <br /> restrictive uses of ground-vvaters will be for drinking water or agricultural purposes. For <br /> surface waters, freshwater aquatic life protection should also be considered. The Findings of <br /> your WDRs should name these uses. <br /> 3) Determine the constituents of the waste which pose a water quality threat, should migration to <br /> waters of the state occur. Total dissolved solids (TDS) and specific conductivity (EC) should <br /> be included. <br /> 4) Determine the water quality objectives which protect the beneficial uses from these waste <br /> constituents of concern. Water quality objectives are listed in the Basin Plan. For ground <br /> water,these objectives are as listed on the attachment"Water Quality Objectives for Ground <br /> Waters". In determining compliance with these narrative water quality objectives, it is often <br /> necessary to refer to water quality criteria established by state and federal agencies for the <br /> protection of various beneficial uses. A compilation of such criteria is contained in the <br /> Regional Board document"A Compilation of Water Quality Goals", available from this office <br /> for$5.00. Where several numerical objectives and/or criteria are available for a single waste <br /> constituent,the most restrictive number should be selected which will protect all present and <br /> probable future beneficial uses. <br /> 5) Determine whether the disposal environment or the waste could be acidic. Acidic conditions <br /> are assumed if the waste will be discharged with other putrescible wastes in the Class III <br /> landfill or if the waste is itself putrescible or otherwise capable of generating acid(e.g" mining <br /> waste which contains oxidizable sulfide minerals and insufficient neutralizing capacity). One <br /> measure of putrescibility is the determination of the total organic carbon (TOC) content of the <br /> waste. If the TOC is at a significant level, usually considered to be 5%or more,the waste is <br /> considered putrescible. Acid generation potential is determined by an acid-base account, as <br /> specified in the EPA publication"Field and Laboratory Methods Applicable to Overburdens <br /> and Minesoils"(National Technical Information Service Publication PB-280 495)or <br /> equivalent methods. Discharge to a monofill or in the foundation layer of the final cap of the <br /> landfill would not be considered acid generating conditions if the waste itself is not putrescible <br /> nor capable of generating acid. <br /> Division 4.5, Chapter 11, Appendix II <br /> 6) Determine the soluble or extractable concentrations of the constituents of representative waste <br /> samples by the Waste Extraction Test(WET) [Title 22 CCR, Seet-ien 66700]. The extraction <br /> solutions should be as specified in the regulations if the waste will be discharged with other <br /> putrescible wastes in the Class III landfill or if the waste is itself putrescible or otherwise <br /> capable of generating acid. The extraction solution may be deionized water if the waste will be <br /> discharged to a monofill or placed in the foundation of the final cap of the landfill and the <br /> 01 waste is not putrescible nor capable of acid generation. The resulting extract(s) should be <br /> analyzed for all waste constituents specified in section (3) above. The deionized water extract <br /> should also be analyzed for total dissolved solids (TDS), specific conductivity(EC), and pH. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.