My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_4
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2005_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2022 3:00:48 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:50:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2005_4 N&O 03-01+
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2005_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
812
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> IIo011�III111111RRI11111RA <br /> Fa <br /> m: Curt Fujii[Curt.Fujii@awin.com] <br /> Monday, December 12, 2005 5:14 PM <br /> Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Soil Definition Letter <br /> Hi Robert, <br /> Thanks for getting back to me. <br /> Regarding item 1 in your e-mail, I will revise the letter to state that, for any <br /> potentially contaminated soil, we will require the generator to analyze soluble levels of <br /> any contaminants that have LEA Clean Soil Levels, regardless of the total concentrations <br /> of those contaminants. <br /> Regarding item 2, I have a question. I assume that you mean that soil that is not <br /> suitable for cover, but is suitable for other beneficial uses, must be stockpiled and <br /> inventoried. Is this assumption correct? In other words, I assume that we don't need to <br /> stockpile and inventory soil if we report it as disposed (i.e. , include it under the <br /> permit tonnage cap) . Is this correct? <br /> Thanks <br /> >>> "Robert McClellon [EH] " <RMcClellon@sjcehd.com> 12/12/05 10:59 AM >>> <br /> Curt we are still looking it over. Sorry for the delay. I have had a lot of staff out sick <br /> as of late and things have been busy. SO far we have the following comments: <br /> Under LEA Clean Soil. . . , the LEA Clean Soil Levels will not be analyzed for unless <br /> total concentration is 10 times the state STLC level. The State STLC level is the <br /> *hazardous level and is much higher than the LEA level. With this proposal, the LEA level <br /> will never be analyzed for. <br /> The proposed clean soil shall be evaluated for the LEA level at all time, regardless <br /> of the total concentration or considered contaminated for the purposes of counting. <br /> 2. Under the Physical Characteristic, if the load of soil is not suitable for cover, it <br /> needs to be stockpiled and inventoried some way that the LEA can determine it's <br /> destination. <br /> Thanks Robert <br /> Robert McClellon, Supervising RENS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 E. Weber Ave Third Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> (209) 468-0332 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Curt Fujii [mailto:Curt.Fujii@awin.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:07 AM <br /> To: Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: Soil Definition Letter <br /> Hi Robert, <br /> know you're really busy now, and I don't want to be a nuisance, but I wanted to see if <br /> 've had a chance to review the latest draft clean soil letter. <br /> With the Holidays approaching, I'm sure that we don't want to rush this thing at the last <br /> minute. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.