Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2003-0049 -20- <br /> FORWARD INC. AND ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES <br /> FOR.OPERATION OF <br /> FORWARD CLASS Tf.LAi\TDFILL <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 10.The methods of analysis and the detection limits used must be appropriate for the <br /> expected concentT.ations. For the monitoring of any constituent or parameter that is found <br /> in concentrations which produce more than 90%non-numerical determinations (i.e.,. <br /> "trace"or"ND") in,data from background monitoring points for that medium, the <br /> analytical method having the lowest method detection limit(MDL) shall be selected from <br /> among those methods which would provide valid results in light of any matrix effects or <br /> interferences. <br /> 11. "Trace" results -results falling between the NML and the practical quantitation limit <br /> (PQL)-shall be reported as such,and shall be accompanied both by the estimated MDL <br /> and PQL values for that analytical run. <br /> 12. MDILs and PQLs shall be derived by the laboratory for each analytical procedure, <br /> according to State of Califom.ia laboratory accreditation procedures. These MDIs and <br /> PQLs shall reflect the detection and quantitation capabilities of the specific analytical <br /> procedure and equipment used by the lab,rather than simply being quoted from USEPA <br /> analytical method manuals. In relatively interference-free water, laboratory-derived <br /> MDLs and PQLs are expected to closely agree with published USEPA MDLs and PQLs. <br /> 13. If the laboratory suspects that, due to a change in matrix or other effects,the true <br /> detection limit or quantitation limit for a particular analytical run differs significantly <br /> from the laboratoiy-derived MD.UPQL values,the results shall be flagged accordingly, <br /> along with estimates of the detection limit and quantitation limit actually achieved. The <br /> MDL shall always be calculated such that it represents the lowest achievable <br /> concentration associated with a 99% reliability of a nonzero result. The PQL shall <br /> always be calculated such that it represents the lowest constituent concentration at which <br /> a numerical value can be assigned with reasonable certainty that it represents the <br /> constituent's actual concentration in the sample. Normally, PQLs should be set equal to <br /> the concentration of the lowest standard used to calibrate the analytical procedure. <br /> 14. All QA./QC data shall be reported, along with the sample results to which they apply, <br /> including the method, equipment, analytical detection and quantitation limits,the percent <br /> recovery, an explanation for any recovery that falls outside the QC limits,the results of <br /> equipment and method blanks, the results of spiked and surrogate samples, the frequency <br /> of quality control analysis, and the name and qualifications of the person(s)perfon-nig <br /> the; wialyses. Sample results shall be reported unadjusted for blank results or spike <br /> recoveries. In cases where contaminants are detected in QA/QC samples (i.e., field, trip, <br /> or lab blanks), the accompanying sample results shall be appropriately flagged, <br /> 15. Unknown chromatographic peaks shall be reported, along with an estimate of the <br /> concentration of the unknown analyte. When unknown peaks are encountered, second <br /> ZZ d O lZ0SHM 'ON/99:N 'iS/MO[ 90N N IMNON) Nodi <br />