My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007_4
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 11:42:44 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:52:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2007_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2007_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of Northern California Youth Center Sampling Results Week of May 14,2007 <br /> Forward Landfill-Austin Road Unit,California Page 3 <br /> Water Supply Well Sample Results <br /> Samples of each of the three operating water supply wells were collected during the Week of May 14. <br /> The concentration of tetrachloroethene in Well No. 2 was 6.6 ug/1, in Well No. 3 was 13 ug/l, and in <br /> Well No. 4 was 0.21 ug/1 in both a primary and a duplicate sample. Well No. 4 is reported to be the <br /> primary well supplying water to the facility,with Well No.2 operating about 20%of the time to supply <br /> supplemental water during periods of peak demand such as lawn irrigation. We were informed by <br /> NCYC personnel that Well No.4 was operating immediately prior to,during,and after the storage tank <br /> cleaning operations. <br /> These water supply sample results are reasonably comparable to previous sample results. Sampling <br /> conducted in February 2007 at Well No. 2 yielded a tetrachloroethene concentration of 3.4 ug/1 <br /> compared to the May concentration of 6.6 ug/l. The tetrachloroethene concentration in Well No. 3 in <br /> February 2007 was 17 ug/1 in both a primary and a duplicate sample, compared to a May 2007 <br /> concentration of 13 ug/l. The tetrachloroethene concentration in Well No. 4 in February 2007 was 1.3 <br /> ug/1,compared to a May 2007 concentration of 0.21 ug/1 in both the primary and duplicate sample. <br /> Tentative Conclusions <br /> The storage tank sediment removal operations do not appear to have measurably affected the water <br /> quality in the storage tanks or the indoor faucet. <br /> The tetrachloroethene concentration at the well supplying water to the system(reported to be Well No. <br /> 4) is below the MCL and significantly lower than the water quality in the storage tanks and at the <br /> indoor faucet, both prior to tank sediment removal activities and after completion of tank sediment <br /> removal activities. The concentrations of tetrachloroethene in the storage tanks and at the indoor faucet <br /> suggest a source other than the water from Well No.4. <br /> The concentration of tetrachloroethene in Well No. 2 is lower than the concentration of <br /> tetrachloroethene at the indoor faucet,based on data collected by Herst&Associates,Inc. These data <br /> ' suggest a source other than the water from Well No. 2, which reportedly only operates about 20% of <br /> the time. <br /> ' The concentration of tetrachloroethene in Well No. 3 is higher than the concentration of <br /> tetrachloroethene in the storage tanks and the indoor faucet, but previous discussions with NCYC <br /> personnel indicate that Well No. 3 has not been used to supply water to the facility at any time during <br /> the last 10 years. Accordingly, it does not appear that water from Well No. 3 is the source of the <br /> observed tetrachloroethene in the storage tanks or the indoor faucet. <br /> ' Well No. 2 yields tetrachloroethene concentrations that range from slightly below the MCL to slightly <br /> above the MCL. The results are ambiguous in terms of the need to treat the water pumped from Well <br /> No.2 in order to meet the tetrachloroethene MCL. <br /> ' The indoor faucet sample continued to exhibit tetrachloroethene concentrations above the MCL. The <br /> source of the tetrachloroethene to the faucet is not clearly identifiable based on sample results collected <br /> to date. <br /> Evaluations continue regarding appropriate corrective measures to address the current situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.