Table 1.—Occupational exposure limits and biologic monitoring,medical screening,and morbidity and
<br /> for asbestos mortality data. This analysis may provide information about
<br /> the relatedness of adverse health effects and occupational ex-
<br /> Exposure 3imits ex-
<br /> mg/m"' posure that cannot be discerned from results in individual
<br /> _OSHA PEL TWA 0.2 workers.Sensitivity,specificity,and predictive values of bio-
<br /> Action level 0.1 logic monitoring and medical screening tests should be evalu-
<br /> NIOSH REL TWA (Ca)t 0.1 ated on an industrywide basis prior to application in any given
<br /> ACGIH TLV® TWA(Ala)§ worker group. Intrinsic to a surveillance program is the dis-
<br /> Chrysotile 2.0 semination of summary data to those who need to know, in-
<br /> Amosite 0.5 cluding employers, occupational health professionals,
<br /> 0 2 potentially exposed workers,and regulatory and public health
<br /> Crocidolite
<br /> agencies.
<br /> Other forms 2.0
<br /> • Preplacement medical evaluation
<br /> * Fibers greater than 5 lAm in length. Prior to placing a worker in a job with a potential for exposure
<br /> t(Ca):NIOSH recommends treating as a potential human car- to asbestos,the physician should evaluate and document the
<br /> cinogen. worker's baseline health status with thorough medical,environ-
<br /> §(Ala): Human carcinogen with an assigned TLV°. mental,and occupational histories,a physical examination,and
<br /> HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION physiologic and laboratory tests appropriate for the anticipat-
<br /> ed occupational risks.These should concentrate on the func-
<br /> • Routes of exposure tion and integrity of the respiratory system using the principles
<br /> Asbestos may cause adverse health effects following exposure and methods recommended by NIOSH and the American
<br /> via inhalation or ingestion. Thoracic Society (ATS).
<br /> • Summary of toxicology
<br /> 1.Effects on animals:Single intrapleural injections of asbestos A preplacement medical evaluation is recommended in order
<br /> in rats,rabbits,and hamsters produced mesothelioma(cancer to detect and assess preexisting or concurrent conditions which
<br /> of the chest or abdominal linings). In rats,chronic inhalation may be aggravated or result in increased risk when a worker
<br /> or oral administration of asbestos produced cancers of the is exposed to asbestos at or below the NIOSH REL. The ex-
<br /> lungs,stomach,kidneys,liver,or mammary glands.All forms amining physician should consider the probable frequency,in-
<br /> of asbestos were found to be carcinogenic in treated animals. tensity, and duration of exposure, as well as the nature and
<br /> 2.Effects on humans:Exposure to asbestos has been found to degree of the condition, in placing such a worker. Such con-
<br /> significantly increase the risks of contracting asbestosis,lung ditions, which should not be regarded as absolute contraindi-
<br /> -ancer, and mesothelioma. cations to job placement, include cigarette smoking,
<br /> • Signs and symptoms of exposure preexisting asbestos-related disease,and significant breathing
<br /> 1. Short-term (acute): Exposure to asbestos can cause short- impairment due to preexisting chronic lung diseases.In addi-
<br /> ness of breath,chest or abdominal pain, and irritation of the tion to the medical interview and physical examination, the
<br /> skin and mucous membranes. means to identify these conditions may include the methods
<br /> 2. Long-term (chronic): Exposure to asbestos can cause recommended by NIOSH and ATS.
<br /> reduced pulmonary function,breathing difficulty,dry cough, • Periodic medical screening and/or biologic monitoring
<br /> broadening and thickening of the ends of the fingers,and bluish Occupational health interviews and physical examinations
<br /> discoloration of the skin and mucous membranes. should be performed at regular intervals.Additional examina-
<br /> RECOMMENDED MEDICAL PRACTICES tions may be necessary should a worker develop symptoms that
<br /> may be attributed to exposure to asbestos.The interviews,ex-
<br /> Medical surveillance program aminations,and appropriate medical screening and/or biologic
<br /> Workers with potential exposures to chemical hazards should monitoring tests should be directed at identifying an excessive
<br /> be monitored in a systematic program of medical surveillance decrease or adverse trend in the physiologic function of the
<br /> intended to prevent or control occupational injury and disease. respiratory system as compared to the baseline status of the in-
<br /> The program should include education of employers and work- dividual worker or to the expected values for a suitable refer-
<br /> ers about work-related hazards,placement of workers in jobs ence population. The following tests should be used and
<br /> that do not jeopardize their safety and health,earliest possi- interpreted according to standardized procedures and evalua-
<br /> ble detection of adverse health effects,and referral of workers tion criteria recommended by NIOSH and ATS:standardized
<br /> for diagnostic confirmation and treatment.The occurrence of questionnaires, tests of lung function, and chest X-rays.
<br /> disease(a"sentinel health event,"SHE)or other work-related • Medical practices recommended at the time of job trans-
<br /> adverse health effects should prompt immediate evaluation of fer or termination
<br /> primary preventive measures(e.g_,industrial hygiene monitor- The medical,environmental,and occupational history inter-
<br /> ing,engineering controls,and personal protective equipment). views,the physical examination,and selected physiologic and
<br /> A medical surveillance program is intended to supplement,not laboratory tests which were conducted at the time of placement
<br /> replace, such measures. should be repeated at the time of job transfer or termination.
<br /> A medical surveillance program should include systematic col- Any changes in the worker's health status should be compared
<br /> lection and epidemiologic analysis of relevant environmental to those expected for a suitable reference population. Because
<br /> 2 Asbestos 1988
<br />
|