My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2009_19
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2009_19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:32 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:54:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2009_19
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2009_19.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ASBESTOS by TEM: METHOD 7402, Issue 2,dated 15 August 1994 -Page 5 of 7 <br /> b. Center a fiber, focus, and center the smallest field-limiting aperture on the fiber. Obtain a <br /> diffraction pattern. Photograph each distinctive pattern and keep the photo for comparison <br /> to unknowns. <br /> NOTE: Not all fibers will present diffraction patterns. The objective lens current may need <br /> adjustment to give optimum pattern visibility. There are many more amphiboles <br /> which give diffraction patterns similar to the analytes named on p. 7402-1. Some, <br /> but not all, of these can be eliminated by chemical separations. Also, some <br /> non-amphiboles (e.g., pyroxenes, some talc fibers) may interfere. <br /> 17. Acquire energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra on approximately 5 fibers having diameters <br /> between 0.25 and 0.5 prn of each asbestos variety obtained from standard reference materials <br /> [71- <br /> NOTE: The sample may require tilting to obtain adequate signal. Use same tilt angle for all <br /> spectra. <br /> a. Prepare TEM grids of all asbestos varieties. <br /> b. Use acquisition times(at least 100 sec)sufficient to show a silicon peak at least 75%of the <br /> monitor screen height at a vertical scale of >_500 counts per channel. <br /> c. Estimate the elemental peak heights visually as follows: <br /> (1) Normalize all peaks to silicon (assigned an arbitrary value of 10). <br /> (2) Visually interpret all other peaks present and assign values relative to the silicon peak. <br /> (3) Determine an elemental profile for the fiber using the elements Na, Mg, Si, Ca, and Fe. <br /> Example: 0-4-10-3-<1 [7]. <br /> NOTE: In fibers other than asbestos, determination of Al, K, Ti, S, P, and F may also <br /> be required for fiber characterization. <br /> (4) Determine a typical range of profiles for each asbestos variety and record the profiles <br /> for comparison to unknowns. <br /> MEASUREMENT: <br /> 18. Perform a diffraction pattern inspection on all sample fibers counted under the TEM, using the <br /> procedures given in step 17. Assign the diffraction pattern to one of the following structures: <br /> a. chrysotile; <br /> b. amphibole; <br /> c. ambiguous; <br /> d. none. <br /> NOTE: There are some crystalline substances which exhibit diffraction patterns similar to those <br /> of asbestos fibers. Many of these, (brucite, halloysite, etc.) can be eliminated from <br /> consideration by chemistry. There are, however, several minerals(e.g., pyroxenes, <br /> massive amphiboles, and talc fibers)which are chemically similar to asbestos and can <br /> be considered interferences. The presence of these substances may warrant the use of <br /> more powerful diffraction pattern analysis before positive identification can be made. If <br /> interferences are suspected, morphology can play an important role in making positive <br /> identification. <br /> 19. Obtain EDX spectra in either the TEM or STEM modes from fibers on field samples using the <br /> procedure of step 18. Using the diffraction pattern and EDX spectrum, classify the fiber: <br /> a_ For a chrysotile structure, obtain EDX spectra on the first five fibers and one out of ten <br /> thereafter. Label the range profiles from 0-5-10-0-0 to 0-10-10-0-0 as"chrysotile" <br /> b. For an amphibole structure, obtain EDX spectra on the first 10 fibers and one out of ten <br /> thereafter. Label profiles ca. 0-2-10-0-7 as"possible amosite"; profiles ca. 1-1-10-" as <br /> "possible crocidolite'; profiles ca. 04-10-3-<1 as "possible tremolite'; and profiles ca. <br /> 0-3-10-0-1 as"possible anthophyllite" <br /> NOTE: The range of profiles for the amphiboles will vary up to ± 1 unit for each of the <br /> elements present according to the relative detector efficiency of the spectrometer. <br /> c. For an ambiguous structure,obtain EDX spectra on all fibers. Label profiles similar to the <br /> chrysotile profile as"possible chrysotile." Label profiles similar to the various amphiboles as <br /> "possible amphiboles." Label all others as"unknown" or"non-asbestos." <br /> NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods(NMAM). Fourth Edition, 8/15194 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.