My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_14
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 12:56:45 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:55:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010_14
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2010_14.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
415
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The GSE Drainage Design Manual Chapter 4—Design Methods And Concepts <br /> FSD=overall factor of safety for drainage(dimensionless), <br /> RFcR=reduction factor for long-term creep(dimensionless), <br /> RFcc=reduction factor for chemical clogging(dimensionless), <br /> RFBc=reduction factor for biological clogging(dimensionless). <br /> The allowable transmissivity (®dr.) in Equation 4.24 should be compared with the 100-hour <br /> transmissivity value obtained from a test.The specified 100-hour transmissivity value should be <br /> equal to or higher than the allowable value of transmissivity. Typical 100-hour transmissivity <br /> data for some products is presented in Appendix A. The designer should contact manufacturers <br /> for the most up-to-date information on their products. <br /> In addition to the reduction factors in Equation 4.24, a review of the chemical compatibility <br /> of the resin used in the geonet to the fluid that the geonet will be exposed to, should be <br /> performed. Most geonets are made of HDPE,which is very resistant to most environments where <br /> they are used; therefore, this is seldom an issue. Ultimately, the engineer's review should result <br /> in a "go no-go" determination, in which the designer decides that the material is acceptable for <br /> use or not.If it is deemed acceptable, no reduction in the required transmissivity is applied due to <br /> the chemical degradation associated with chemical compatibility issues. <br /> The allowable transmissivity discussed here should not be confused with the index <br /> transmissivity used for purposes of quality control or conformance testing.The latter is typically <br /> performed between steel plates for 15 minutes at a pressure of 10,000 to 15,000 psf and is <br /> completely unsuitable for the purpose of design. Project specifications can include both <br /> performance and index transmissivity requirements provided that a clear distinction is made <br /> between them. <br /> 4.3.1 Drainage Factor of Safety, FSD <br /> The overall drainage factor of safety should be applied to take into account possible uncertainties <br /> in the selection and determination of the design parameters. When selecting an appropriate factor <br /> of safety for drainage,the designer should evaluate the criticality of the project, considering such <br /> factors as: (i) the cost of repair; (ii) the potential for loss of life; (iii) the certainty of the design <br /> parameters; and (iv) the probability of failure. Recommended values of FSD are typically <br /> between 2.0 to 3.0 [Giroud, et al., 2000x], with a larger value resulting in a larger required <br /> geocomposite transmissivity, and therefore, higher cost. The authors of this design manual <br /> believe that lower-end values (i.e., 2.0) are acceptable for most projects, since the performance <br /> of geosynthetic materials is fairly well established.Narejo&Richardson [2002] propose a value <br /> of 2.0 as an overall factor of safety for drainage. <br /> 4.3.2 Chemical Clogging Reduction Factor, RFcc <br /> The chemical clogging reduction factor is intended to account for the clogging of the <br /> geocomposite due to precipitates deposited from high alkalinity soils (typically calcium and <br /> magnesium). The designer should evaluate the soils and waste he/she anticipates being placed on <br /> the drainage system. GRI-GC8 recommends using values in the range of 1.0 to 1.2 for chemical <br /> clogging in the final cover system (see Table 4.4). If the designer finds that high alkalinity soils <br /> or other precipitants are not present,use of the lower value(i.e., 1.0)should be acceptable. <br /> Page 4-24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.