My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_14
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2010_14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2020 12:56:45 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:55:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2010_14
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2010_14.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
415
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATIC AND SEISMIC STABILITY ANALYSIS <br /> WMU FU-10 FORWARD LANDFILL <br /> PROBLEM: <br /> Assess the static and seismic stability of the refuse over the base and side slope lining system for WMU <br /> FU-10 at the Forward Landfill. <br /> GIVEN: <br /> These calculations have been previously performed for the prior WMUs at the site and they have been <br /> found to have a satisfactory factor of safety and seismic deformation. The analysis for WMU FU-10 is <br /> similar to WMUs FU-03,ART-03,FU-04,FU-05,FU-06,FU-08 and various other WMUs at the site. <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> 1. According to the site development and final grading plans for the site,the maximum planned elevation <br /> of refuse for the landfill in the WMU FU-10 area is 200 ft MSL. This elevation occurs at the <br /> intersection of the south and west facing final fill slopes along a NE to SW cross section. The effective <br /> slope through this section is approximately 4:1. The 200 ft elevation may only be achieved if waste <br /> placement occurs in adjacent waste management units. <br /> 2. The planned maximum elevation of refuse in WMU FU-10,prior to the development of adjacent <br /> waste management units,is 150 ft MSL.This elevation is based on 3:1 slopes on the south and east. <br /> The west slope is filled against an existing refuse slope. The north slope is filled against the southern <br /> slope of the former Austin Road Landfill. <br /> 3. Development is planned to the east and south of WMU FU-10. These slopes are,therefore,temporary <br /> and will eventually be buttressed by adjacent slopes. <br /> STABILITY ANALYSIS SECTIONS AND CRITERIA: <br /> 1. The critical cross section for the stability analysis under the maximum filling configuration(refuse fill <br /> elevation 200 ft)is in the NE-SW direction. <br /> 2. The acceptable static factor of safety is 1.5 for permanent slopes. For interim slopes,a static factor of <br /> safety of 1.2 to 1.3 is acceptable. <br /> 3. For seismic analyses,acceptable deformations are less than 1-foot. <br /> SUMMARY OF STABILITY ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> 1. The minimum factor of safety under the Forward Landfill maximum fall configuration(refuse elev. <br /> 200 ft)is 1.96. The critical failure surface extends from the bench at an approximate elevation of 150- <br /> 2 MSL,through the refuse mass,and then along the base(cuhion geotextile/HDPE)and slope liner. <br /> From the seismic analysis,the anticipated amount of deformation is less than 1-inch. <br /> 2. The minimum factor of safety for WMU FU-10 under the planned interim fill configuration(refuse <br /> elev. 150 ft)is 1.57. The critical failure surface extends from approximately the crest of refuse, <br /> through the refuse mass,and then along the base liner. Both the base liner interfaces(clay/HDPE and <br /> cushion geotextile/HDPE)were analyzed but the cushion geotextile/HDPE condition was found to be <br /> more critical. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.