Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> CalRecycle <br /> Disposal Facility Inspection Report (52) <br /> Enforcement Agency County of San Joaquin <br /> SWIS Facility,Fiie NumberInspection Date „ . Prf►gram Coct� <br /> .. „ <br /> 39-AA-0015 6/3/2010 LEA Periodic <br /> Time ii Time.,0uf Inspection Time t <br /> 1 r,'1X <br /> Facility Name Recewed By <br /> Forward Landfill, Inc. Forward, Inc./Allied Waste North America <br /> Fac�l�ty Location : ' u> � owner Name � <br /> 9999 S.Austin Road, Manteca 95336 <br /> Inspector � Also Present(Name] <br /> Robert McClellon ITadese Gebrehawariat <br /> THE ABOVE FACILITY WAS INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DIVISION 30 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE(PRC)AND TITLE td AND TITLE 27 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS(CCR) <br /> NO vlOitlons Or:Area8 bf Concern I nz . <br /> x PRC 44014(b)-Operator Complies with Terms&Conditions of Permit <br /> Comments: The facility operator has failed to submit the quarterly gas monitoring to the EHD. The quarterly gas <br /> monitoring needs to be submitted to the EHD within 30 days of the completed quarter. <br /> x 20690-Alternative Daily Cover <br /> Comments: During the removal of the Tarp 1`o” Matic, the EHD staff notice that the tarps had large tears in them. <br /> Some of the sections had tears that exceeded 3 feet long. Properly repair or replace all torn tarps by June 30, <br /> 2010. <br /> x 20921 -Gas Monitoring and Control <br /> Comments: During the routine inspection the perimeter monitoring probes GP 9, GP 11 and GP12 were sampled <br /> using the Landtec Gem 2000. Perimeter monitoring probe GP 11 (s)(i)(d)exceeded 5% methane by volume.This <br /> is a violation of state minimum standards. The facility operator needs to review all recent adjustments made to <br /> the gas extraction system and determine if the system is functioning properly. If the review of the system <br /> operations reveals that addtional adjustments need to be made or maintenance is due, then the facility operator <br /> needs to follow through and make those changes. The results of the sampling are as follows: <br /> GP 9 (s)0.0%CH4(i)0.0% CH4 (d)0.0% <br /> GP 11 (s)7.3% CH4 (i)8.2% CH4(d)0.0% CH4 <br /> GP12(s)0.0% CH4(i)0.0% CH4(d)0.0% CH4 <br /> The gas levels in GP 11 are trending lower since the May, 212010 inspection date.The operator is directed to <br /> comply with T27CCR, Section 20937, and within 60 days of detection, implement a remediation plan that has <br /> been approved by the EHD and CalRecycle (formerly CIWMB). <br /> Inspection Rep- Comrn'ents: ` <br /> A routine inspection was conducted this date and the following was noted: <br /> 1. The site had litter fences in place and onsite litter was minimal. <br /> 2. The water truck was running and dust control was effetive. <br /> 3. The site is using goats to control onsite vegetation. <br />