Laserfiche WebLink
'A 6- <br /> CalRecycle <br /> Disposal Facility Inspection Report (52) <br /> SWIS Facility File Number(99-xx-9999) Inspection Date Program Code <br /> 39-AA-0015 1/29/2010 LEA Periodic <br /> Time In Time Out Inspection Time. <br /> Facility Name Received By , <br /> Forward Landfill, Inc. Forward, Inc./Allied Waste North America <br /> Facility.Location`= Owner Name <br /> 9999 S.Austin Road <br /> Inspector A,Iso Present(Name) <br /> Robert McClellon <br /> THE ABOVE FACILITY WAS INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DIVISION 30 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE(PRC)AND TITLE 14 AND TITLE 27 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS(CCR) <br /> No violations or Areas of Concern <br /> U. =A Regulations . <br /> X 20580-Lighting <br /> Comments:There were 3 light towers being used at the working face. The tipping area did not have adequate light for safe operations. <br /> Provide an additional light tower immediately. <br /> X 20680-Daily Cover <br /> Comments:The daily cover from the prvious day exhibited daylighting of waste in several areas. Properly cover the waste each night with 6 <br /> inches of compacted soil or the appropriate thickness of ADC. <br /> X 20860-Traffic Control <br /> Comments:The working face was small and immediately adjacent to the access road.During the moring rush vehicle traffic was heavy and <br /> congested. Maintain traffic control at the working face to reduce congestion and increase safety. <br /> X 20919-Gas Control <br /> Comments:The EHD was notified on January 13,2010 that GP 11 exceeded the 5%by volume in air for methane.The instances occurred <br /> on 01/04/2010,01/06/2010 and 01/11/2010.The facility operator took measures to adjust the gas extraction system to control the migration <br /> of landfill gas.During the inspection the gas levels in GP 11 were 3.0%CH4(s),2.4%CH4(I),and 0.0%CH4(d).Continue to monitor the <br /> perimeter gas probes and adjust the gas extraction system to mimize the migration of landfill gas. <br /> Inspection Report Comments: <br /> A routine inspection was conducted this date and the following was noted: <br /> 1.The facility had minor erosion rills in areas throught the landfill.The erosion did not expose waste.Monitor and if necessary take action to control <br /> excessive erosion. <br /> 2.The facility had a large amount of leachate in the new cell near the scale house.It appears that a storm drain may be dischaging into that area. <br /> Divert all storm water from this area to reduce the amount of leachate being generated.The leachate is being contained in the cell at this time. <br /> 3.Ponding is occurring through out the facility.The ponding is mostly occurring in small depressions. If possible drain those areas and reduce the <br /> ponding until the surfaces can be regraded to promote runoff. <br /> 4.The facility is receiving PGM from the RRF.The PGM is being utilized as ADC in the landfill,but the PGM is not being reported as volume being <br /> received by the lanfill.All vehicles and waste volumes need to tracked and reported as they are received by the facility. <br />