Laserfiche WebLink
11 <br />Caroll Mortensen <br />January 13, 2012 <br />Page 10 <br />C <br />IV.0-4. Increasing the number of allowable Sundays that the landfill would operate <br />would result in a significant increase in noise levels on these comparatively peaceful <br />days. While the noise generated by the facility's equipment will be intrusive, the noise <br />generated by 1,200 to almost 2,000 heavy-duty trips would be particularly severe. <br />Excessively loud single -noise events, such as those associated with heavy-duty trucks, <br />are particularly burdensome to sensitive receptors. In fact, the decibel level of a heavy- <br />duty truck can be as high as 82 dBA fifty feet from the center line of a roadway. DEIR at <br />IV.0-5, Table IV.0-3. <br />Increasing truck trips by this magnitude on Sundays would certainly <br />exceed the County's 65 dB Ldn threshold for many outdoor residential uses and would <br />likely exceed the 45 dB Ldn threshold for certain indoor residential uses. Although the <br />County's noise ordinance clearly requires that these elevated noise levels be mitigated, no <br />mitigation measures have been identified in the SWFP ND. <br />3. The Increase in Landfill Operations Will Have Potentially <br />Significant Air Quality Impacts. <br />Forward's proposal to increase the number of days per year that the landfill <br />would operate would result in a potentially significant increase in air pollutants. There <br />are numerous sources of emissions associated with landfill operations: fugitive dust <br />(PMIo and PM 2,5) from earth -moving; and reactive organic gas ("ROG"), nitrogen oxides <br />("NOX"), and carbon monoxide ("CO") from the flare and LFG engines. Landfill -related <br />trucks and vehicles emit ROG, NO, CO, PMIo, and PM2,5. See 2010 DEIR at IV.D-3 <br />through IV.D-6. <br />Existing air quality in the vicinity of the landfill is poor. Data from the <br />nearby monitoring station shows that the area exceeds the California and federal ozone <br />standard between 7 and 21 days per year, the PMIo standard between 18 and 62 days per <br />year, and the PM2.5 standard between about 9 and 34 days per year. 2010 DEIR at IV.D- <br />16 Table IV.D-2. Given the poor air quality in the area, any increase in emissions <br />certainly has the potential to result in additional exceedances of state and federal air <br />quality standards. <br />In addition, the substantial increase in truck trips would expose nearby <br />residents to elevated concentrations of diesel particulate matter ("DPM"). The California <br />Air Resources Board ("CARB") identified the particulate fraction of diesel exhaust as a <br />toxic air contaminant and has concluded that diesel exhaust is a potent carcinogen. <br />CARB, June 1998. The SWFP ND did not evaluate the increase in risk of chronic and <br />SHUTE f MIHALY <br />--WEINBERGERu_P <br />