Laserfiche WebLink
2. Review of work progress since previous meeting: <br />- Guinn conducted potholing in the area of subgrade fill on the east facing slope <br />identified by Sangeeta in the Pre -Construction Meeting to determine the existing <br />cover thickness. Based on the potholing, it was concluded that adequate thickness <br />of cover soil has been placed in this location and no further action is necessary. <br />- Guinn exposed the tie-in from the previous WMU construction. <br />- Guinn continued to place embankment fill (approximately 15,000 cubic yards) <br />and should be to the 2:1 slope by today or tomorrow. <br />- The evaluation of potential clay material in the existing cell does not meet the <br />specified requirements for clay content. Guinn has identified an area approximately <br />400 feet to the east of the WMU and will pothole today and provide samples for <br />evaluation by GLA. This material looks promising and Guinn will try to keep the cut <br />no deeper than 4 feet to remove the clay. <br />- Guinn stockpiled approximately 5,500 cubic yards of operations soil. <br />- Guinn is removing soil from around the existing leachate tank. <br />- Guinn began exposing the geogrid. <br />3. Projected schedule: <br />- Guinn will continue placing soil in the embankment fill. <br />- Republic (Lochlin) will call Skaps to order the geotextile and will cut a P.O. for <br />the material. Lochlin will also contact Agru for the HDPE geomembrane. <br />- Comanco was told that the geomembrane material and WMU should be ready <br />for liner installation on June 24tH <br />Guinn will complete about 20 feet of floor area at the toe of the slopes to allow <br />for liner placement on the side slopes. <br />- GLA will obtain the clay pothole samples and Scott P. will deliver to GLA's <br />geotechnical laboratory for testing. <br />4. Field observations, problems, conflicts, and changes: <br />- Based on the results of the large scale direct shear (LSDS) testing at other <br />Republic sites, GLA indicated that it may be difficult to obtain the specified shear <br />stresses between the Agru geomembrane and Skaps geotextile. To that end, GLA <br />performed a LSDS test on Agru 60 -mil textured geomembrane and the Skaps <br />geotextile. The three higher normal stresses resulted in passing shear stresses; <br />however the lower (2,000 psf) normal stress had a shear stress slightly below the <br />specified value. Lewis Engineering re -ran the stability analysis using a shear stress <br />of 600 psf and a normal stress of 2,000 and found the results to be acceptable. <br />Based on that result, the Agru material should be acceptable for the project. The <br />LSDS test results have been attached to these meeting minutes. 40 <br />Forward Landfill WMU FU -13 <br />Progress Meeting Minutes Page 2 <br />