My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_4
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2013_4
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2013_4.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.3 Stable Channel Design <br /> The new channel realignment needs to be stable and function as a natural system. Excessive bank <br /> erosion and meandering has to be minimized. The design needs to anticipate the vegetative <br /> succession and perform without flooding or sustaining excessive bank erosion under those <br /> conditions. We are fortunate in that we have a very similar project recently completed. We have <br /> observed the behavior of the channel closely and have adapted our grading plan to geometries that <br /> are more natural and provide more consistent connection to the adjacent floodplain. Representative <br /> and typical cross sections are shown on Sheet 3. <br /> 4.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND METHODOLOGIES <br /> The following discussion outlines the primary design parameters that were considered and <br /> incorporated into the project design. <br /> 4.1 Hydrologic Considerations <br /> One of the basic design parameters of a channel is the amount of flow the channel must carry. <br /> Typically, only the maximum flow is considered. However, in order to design a natural stable <br /> channel a full spectrum of flows must be taken into account. Though large magnitude flows are <br /> important from a flood control standpoint they typically do not occur at frequent intervals and thus <br /> do not contribute to the year in and year out forces acting on the channel, which really shape the <br /> ichannel.This typically is referred to as the channel forming discharge.Large magnitude discharges <br /> typically cause catastrophic bank failures and play a role in the molding the general channel <br /> configuration,at least locally. However, it is the typical winter flows that occur on the order of every <br /> one to two years that drive general channel shape and morphology through erosion and sediment <br /> transport <br /> The hydrologic regime of the South Branch of the South Fork of Littlejohn's Creek is somewhat <br /> unusual. Farmington Reservoir is a flood control reservoir operated by the U.S. Army of Corps of <br /> Engineers located upstream,that controls stormwater flows in the South Branch of the South Fork of <br /> Littlejohn's Creek. A review of average daily releases from Farmington Reservoir for 21 water <br /> years (1979 to 1999) shows the maximum release was 2,420 cubic feet per second (cfs). This <br /> stormwater is divided several tributaries through a series of diversion and gates. Released flow is <br /> often intended for irrigation supply and/or flood control risk management.As such the flows in the <br /> channel do necessarily follow typical storm water runoff hydrographs. Moderate flows may be <br /> sustained for a periods of weeks rather than days. Often,and especially during drought years,there <br /> was no release from Farmington Reservoir and little in creek other than agricultural tailwater. <br /> FEMA Flood Flows <br /> The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)routinely publishes stream flows associated <br /> with return interval(years)for flood insurance purposes.Table 1 below indicates the magnitude and <br /> recurrence interval for peak events at the Austin Road Landfill. <br /> Questa Engineering Corporation 5 270124CDR/November 16, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.