My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_8
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440005
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2013_8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:43 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 10:57:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2013_8
RECORD_ID
PR0440005
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004516
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD DISPOSAL SITE
STREET_NUMBER
9999
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106001-3, 5
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440005_9999 AUSTIN_2013_8.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Today all operating municipal solid waste landfills are required to have a composite liner <br /> and leachate collection system at their base. Regulations require that these landfill <br /> components be constructed over a stable foundation. In many instances however, the <br /> underlying subgrade has the potential for differential settlement and collapse. <br /> The site selection process for a landfill is complex. Local economies and tax structures, <br /> host fees, infrastructure,geology,hydrogeology, nimby(not in my backyard groups)and a <br /> variety of other forces and factors influence the process. Often the most challenging site <br /> from an engineering perspective turns out to be the selection that best serves the common <br /> good. <br /> In 1987, a barge was loaded with bailed waste from Islip New York_ Many months and <br /> many miles later, the barge having found no landfill that would accept the waste,.arrived <br /> back in Islip. The town council, the consulting engineer and the state regulatory agency <br /> all agreed that the best solution.was to construct a new landfill above the old capped <br /> landfill. This resulted in the first landfill liner support installation. <br /> In the late 1980's and eady 1990's all the states in the country upgraded their landfill liner <br /> system1 ions. This left many essentiallandfills f complianee. upgraded <br /> cells could be constructedon adjoining property, the airspace abovet landfill sideslopes <br /> to be closed was a valuable asset no one wanted to abandon. In many instances, it was in <br /> the best interest of all involved to design a"modern"landfill on the sideslope of the landfill <br /> to be capped. <br /> To date dozens of landfills have been constructed over existing landfills, karst topography <br /> and old mine tunnels. The leachate collection systems are monitored to insure that the <br /> landfills are operating as designed. A few landfills have installed strain monitoring systems <br /> below the new liner system. At the Babylon Landfill in New York and the Sawyer Landfill <br /> in Maine, strain readings have indicated that one layer of uniaxial geogrid has reduced <br /> liner strains to well below the design limit. <br /> This paper reviews the design methodology utilized when landfills are sited above <br /> subgrades with the potential for differential settlement and collapse. Subsidence issues <br /> and engineering solutions will be discussed. A design example is also presented for <br /> review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.