ARCHIVED REPORTS_2014_8 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ATTACT3�N'T E 40 CONSOLIDATED FORWARD LANDFILL PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL LMPACT REPORT ERRATA The Heading "E. Public Health and Safety" «'as inadvertently omitted from Tablell-1, p.- 11 of the FEIR. In addition, the first paragraph under 'Proposed as Part of the Project" on that page, as well as the paragraph extending from the bottom of page 129 onto the top of p. 130, and the first paragraph under "E. Public Health and Safety" on p. 7 of Appe-ndix G, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program" in the FEIR are all corrected for clarity to read as follows: Use a total of 17 pieces of equipment (at anygiven time) over the life q --the project to minimize particulate discharge. As sho-u-n in Table IV.EA, (FEIR, p 129), the risk from particulate - and specifically diesel fortes — m7I be lessened for the prey- ct versus the baseline conditions. The existing 28 pieces M'diesel powered landfall oT�erating equipnent Will be changed out every 5 years at Farrand and every 10 years at Au tin, and avould he reduced to a total of 17 pieces of equipment doer a 15 -year or fewer. In addition, the last paragraph on page 128 is corrected to read as follosti s: The risks are considered to be reduced in the proposed project conaparre: to the baseltrte permit conditions because: 1) A lesser arnmint of particulate generating equipment used per ton disposed of 2) Waste avill be Humeri aver a shorter period of time (14 versus 30 in years) and daily hours of equipment openziian will be only slightly increased rather than proportionally increased (10.5 versus 9.0 hours per day), and; 3) the risk protocols evaluates exposure over a 30 -year timefimme and the project avould only result in diesel emissions for 14 years while the continued ZmLl-level operations ofAustin Road landfill under existing permits would occur for the entire 30- year exposure period. The FEIR inadvertently had 30 -year lifetimes for both the proposed project and existing Austin Road landfill. The proposed project would have a 14 -year operational lifespan. The minutes of the San Joaquin County FLmudng Commission's October 3, 2002 Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Consolidated Forward Landfill Project were inadvertently omitted from Section IX, Comments and Responses, of the Final Environmental Impact Report. Those minutes are attached and incorporated bN reference into the Final EIR as Item A(1) following page 236 of the Final EIR. Because no environmental issues or questions are raised in the Commissioners' comments, no response is required.