Laserfiche WebLink
is considered representative of future leachate. In fact, since the standard of practice for <br />load checking and waste stream controls is likely to improve with time and the potential <br />for high concentration leachate will be further reduced, this assumption is considered <br />reasonably conservative. <br />3.4 Dilution -Attenuation Characteristics of the Proposed Single Composite Liner <br />The leachate fate and transport analyses that were performed for the project indicate that <br />leachate constituents would be significantly reduced during transport through the CCL <br />(Appendix A). This is primarily related to the fact that the volume of liquid in a leachate <br />release would be small relative to the volume of pore water included in the CCL as a part <br />of initial construction operations. In fact, owing to the low permeability properties of the <br />clay liner and the small volumes that would be associated with leachate leakage, leachate <br />transport in the CCL would occur very slowly as unsaturated flow. <br />Ignoring the biodegradation processes that would likely greatly reduce the VOC <br />concentrations in leachate, dispersion of leachate during the first 9 years of unsaturated <br />flow through the CCL is calculated to result in a 99% reduction in concentration. This <br />calculated reduction conservatively assumes that one -foot of leachate head is constantly <br />applied on the clay liner and suggests that actual Forward liner performance will be even <br />better if the calculated maximum leachate head (i.e., 1.6 -inches) is achieved. Given the <br />fact that the typical leachate head condition on the liner would likely be significantly less <br />than 1 -foot, or even 1.6 inches, and recognizing that the anticipated Forward site life is <br />only 18 years, elevated leachate concentrations are not expected to reach the bottom of <br />the liner system. <br />However, since leachate constituent concentrations would incrementally increase at the <br />base of the liner after additional time (assuming that high leachate head levels are <br />maintained), the fate and transport analyses detailed in Appendix A also evaluate leachate <br />fate within the vadose zone. As described in Section 4.2, the results of these analyses <br />indicate that leachate leakage would have an insignificant (essentially undetectable) <br />affect on groundwater quality beneath the site. <br />3.5 Lysimeter Impact <br />A number of lysimeters underlie the existing lined cells at the Forward Landfill and <br />monitoring of these lysimeters has indicated that no significant liquid phase release has <br />occurred from the facility. This data further substantiates the inference that the single <br />composite liner proposed for the Forward Landfill expansion is effective. <br />4.0 MITIGATING SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br />Whether or not a leak in the composite liner system could result in actual groundwater <br />pollution depends on several additional factors including: the volume of the leak through <br />the CCL, the chemicals that leak, the concentrations of the leaking chemicals, the <br />IM <br />CA2000-04SWorwnrd Composite Liner V3 .doc109119/02 <br />Geologic Associates <br />