Laserfiche WebLink
completed for the California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank program (Rice et al, 1995) <br />and for the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology (Mace et al., 1997) have found no <br />statistical difference between sites where groundwater remediation activities were <br />implemented and sites where fuel hydrocarbon plumes were allowed to naturally <br />attenuate. Newell et al. (1990) reported similarly stabilized plume configurations for <br />many chlorinated hydrocarbon sites that were allowed to attenuate naturally. <br />Non-destructive processes that result only in the reduction of VOC contaminant <br />concentrations, but not of the total contaminant mass, include dispersion, sorption, <br />dilution, and volatilization. Destructive processes that result in the reduction of <br />contaminant concentrations (and mass) include biodegradation and abiotic degradation <br />mechanisms. <br />As shown in Table 3, the concentrations of nitrate and sulfate in the leachate collected at <br />the Forward Landfill are relatively low compared to the concentrations of these <br />constituents in groundwater near the landfill. Together with the presence of high free <br />iron concentrations and low VOC concentrations measured in leachate collected at the <br />site (Tables 1-3), the low nitrate and sulfate concentrations suggest that anaerobic <br />biodegradation processes favorable for VOC degradation actively occur within the <br />landfill. <br />As detailed in the February and May 2002 report submittals and summarized here in <br />Section 3, the attenuation analyses that were originally completed for the project <br />® conservatively ignored potential sorption, dilution, volatilization and abiotic degradation <br />processes, and focused on dispersion and biodegradation of VOCs within the clay liner. <br />As detailed in the May 30, 2002 report submittal, three sets of attenuation analyses were <br />previously submitted to the RWQCB. These analyses considered 1) saturated leachate <br />leakage conditions (unlikely considering the size of membrane leaks and the hydraulic <br />conductivity of compacted clays); 2) unsaturated leachate leakage conditions; and 3) <br />direct mixing of leaked leachate with groundwater (unlikely considering the attenuation <br />processes likely to occur within both the clay liner and vadose zone). <br />2.5.1 Saturated Flow Analyses <br />The first set of analyses were completed using the U.S. Environmental Protection <br />Agency's (USEPA'S) BIOCHLOR and BIOSCREEN programs (Azia and Newell, 1999; <br />Newell et al., 1996, respectively) to evaluate the fate of select VOCs associated with a <br />hypothetical leachate leak within the proposed Forward Landfill liner. These analyses <br />conservatively ignored potential sorption, dilution, volatilization and abiotic degradation <br />processes, and focused on dispersion and biodegradation of VOCs within the clay liner. <br />The analyses also assumed that saturated flow conditions would exist within the clay <br />liner and that VOC concentrations would be significantly higher than the concentrations <br />historically measured in Forward Landfill leachate samples. These analyses also <br />C:\2002-002\Revised Appx A - Leakageldoc\09/19/02 <br />Geologic Associates <br />