Laserfiche WebLink
contaminated soils. The DHS specified incineration as the primary <br /> treatment method and other recycling (bioreclamation) as the alterna- <br /> tive method. Bioreclamation was selected because of the success of in <br /> situ soil aeration and biodegradation projects at spill sites <br /> throughout the country (see Section 6.4 for a further discussion of <br /> treatment methods for contaminated soils) . <br /> Tables 5-3 through 5-8 present additional hazardous waste generation, <br /> storage capacity and disposal data for 1986. <br /> • In accordance with DHS requirements, Table 5-3 presents a <br /> preliminary needs assessment for commercial hazardous <br /> waste treatment and disposal capacity. Since the data <br /> are based on 1986 manifested wastes only, Table 5-3 <br /> should not be used for planning. Instead, Table 8-1 <br /> should be reviewed. <br /> • Table 5-4 indicates that the County currently has no <br /> hazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities. <br /> • Table 5-5 presents the County' s capacity deficit for <br /> specific treatment modes. An estimated deficit of <br /> 7,745 tons existed in 1986 for manifested wastes only. <br /> • Table 5-6 presents a breakdown of imported wastes by <br /> waste group. <br /> • In 1986, 7,745.43 tons of hazardous wastes were exported <br /> from the County. Table 5-7 identifies the counties <br /> receiving the exported wastes. <br /> • Table 5-8 lists commercial hazardous waste capacity in <br /> 1986. <br /> 5.2.3 Waste Generated in 1986 y Industry Tvoe. Including SMg]] <br /> antity gngrs <br /> 11M <br /> As noted in Table 5-9, available data indicate that no known indus- <br /> tries in the County treat or dispose of their waste on site. <br /> Table 5-10 presents a multiyear planning estimate of hazardous wastes <br /> produced by major generators, households, and small quantity <br /> generators. Based on an analysis of manifest data and discussions <br /> PJ9 9390502D.00D 5-6 Rev. 1 11/08/88 <br />