Laserfiche WebLink
Table 5-5 <br /> (DHS Table D) -- <br /> 1986 COUNTY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR COMMERCIA4 <br /> HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/DISPOSAL CAPACITY <br /> (TONS) <br /> General Required Existing <br /> Treatment Treatment Treatment Capacity Excess (+) — <br /> Methods Capacity Capacity or Deficit (-) <br /> Aqueous Treatment/ 1,379.09 -- -1 ,379.09 <br /> Organic <br /> Aqueous Treatment 2,291 .99 -- -2,291 .99 <br /> Metals/Neutralization <br /> Incineration 828.66 -- -828.66 <br /> Solvent Recovery 121 .25 121 .25 <br /> Oil Recovery 488.51 -- -488.51 <br /> Other Recycling 481 .89 -- -481 .89 <br /> Bioreclamation2 1,541 .03 -- -1,541 .03 <br /> Stabilization 613. 1.1 -- -613. 11 <br /> TOTAL 7,745.53 -7,745.53 <br /> 1 . Includes only manifested hazardous waste data (Table 5-2) . Estimated <br /> quantities of unmanifested wastes (SQGs and households) are not included. <br /> This table is included in the CHWMP in compliance with DHS requirements. <br /> However, the data should not be used to draw inferences concerning the <br /> need for off-site facilities. Instead, Table 8-1 should be used for <br /> planning. <br /> 2. Refers to in situ treatment of contaminated soil . <br /> 3. Residuals disposal quantities were calculated by applying factors provid- <br /> ed by DHS in Table E-2 of thechnicalReference Manualto the Guide- <br /> J <br /> Since no factor was supplied for Other Recycling,�® an average of <br /> factors for alternative treatment methods for these was used. The two <br /> primary wastes in the "Other Recycling" category were organic liquids and <br /> "Other Inorganic Solids. " The average of these two factors is 0.65. <br /> PJ9 93905028.000 5-25 Rev. 0 11/10/88 <br />