My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1989
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
1831
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:52:44 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1989
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1989.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
453
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
used was a 25 -channel Texas Instruments Model Photographic <br />Recording Oscillograph. <br />The energy source used consisted of a 33 -pound sledge hammer <br />equipped with seismograph/oscillograph drive switch and <br />piezoelectric trigger mechanism (time break). <br />Limitations <br />The subsurface velocity profiles presented in this report <br />represent the most reasonable interpretation of seismic <br />refraction survey data based on our knowledge of the existing <br />geologic conditions at the site. The results are presented for <br />design feasibility information only and are not intended to serve <br />as information for determining construction procedures. <br />Interpretations were made in accordance with generally accepted <br />geophysical methods and practices. This warranty is in lieu of <br />all other warranties, express or implied. <br />The quality of seismic refraction data for this survey was <br />good, but in cases was affected by electrical disturbance from a <br />nearby power transmission lines (heavy 60 Hz noise), and in some <br />cases was affected by background noise from passing vehicles and <br />aircraft, slightly irregular terrain, wind, and lateral <br />inhomogeneity (scattered resistant blocks). These factors <br />produced noise signals and/or scatter in the recorded data, <br />limiting the accuracy of first break compression wave picks and <br />interpretation. <br />The seismic refraction method used has some inherent <br />limitations such as the possibility for undetectible hidden <br />layers, blind zones, and velocity inversions. The absence of <br />exploratory borings and other existing subsurface geologic <br />information in the area surveyed may also limit the reliability <br />of interpretation, since more than one interpretation is often <br />Possible for a given set of data. and correlation with borings or <br />other subsurface information is important in establishing <br />accuracy. <br />The maximum depth of reliable seismic information obtained <br />during this survey can be assumed to be approximately one-third <br />of the length of the individual lines, with information at a <br />maximum depth underlying the middl.e one-third of the lines. For <br />example. a seismic refraction line 300 feet in length will <br />typically yield reliable data on subsurface materials to a depth <br />of about 100 feet beneath the middle 100 feet of the line. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.