Laserfiche WebLink
deposits of clays, silts, and very silty or clayey fine-grained sands <br />to a depth of about 100 feet. Layers of gravel and medium- to coarse- <br />grained arkosic sand are common between 100 and 200 feet below the <br />ground surface. <br />B. GROUND -WATER OCCURRENCE AND MOVEMENT <br />Most of the ground water used in eastern San Joaquin County is pumped <br />from the Tertiary Arroyo Seco and underlying Laguna Formations. <br />Although overlying Quaternary units, such as the Riverbank and Turlock <br />Lake Formations, generally contain less ground water, some wells in <br />the region draw large yields from discontinuous sand and gravel layers <br />within these units. Ground water is primarily recharged by percola- <br />tion from surface waters originating in the foothills of the adjacent <br />Sierra Nevada Mountains. <br />The San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District <br />has monitored ground -water levels and quality in the County since <br />1971. Ground -water elevation contour maps from the District (1985 to <br />1987) indicate ground -water elevations in wells range from approxi- <br />mately -10 to -20 feet mean sea level (MSL) in the site vicinity. The <br />regional flow gradient is shown to be to the southwest. <br />EMCON conducted a well survey and identified 38 water supply wells on <br />and within 1 mile of the site (see Figure 3). Additional wells may <br />exist. Water -level depth measurements, taken in August 1987, in 16 of <br />these wells ranged from 121 to 164 feet (approximately -19 to -27 feet <br />MSL; see Table 1). The local gradient is very flat over most of the <br />area, but appears to be generally to the west-southwest (see Fig- <br />ure 4). Actual local flow directions are anticipated to be influenced <br />seasonally by pumpage of irrigation wells. <br />Ground water is found in site wells (G-1, G-2, and W-1) at depths of <br />124 to 143 feet (-19 to -21 feet MSL). Water -level measurements from <br />water supply Well W-2 are not considered reliable due to the large <br />PJ9 9390207.000 3 <br />