My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1992
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:53:10 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:01:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1992
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17720 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4433_PR0440058_17720 E HARNEY_1992.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
312
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in June and highest in October. The original <br />characterization study was performed primarily during the <br />month of June, 1990. Therefore, a partial sampling was <br />performed in the month of October, the highest quantity <br />month, and the beginning of the winter season. <br />The seasonal sampling was performed using the same <br />methodology used in the initial study. However, only <br />seven samples were obtained from each of the four waste <br />sources - Residential, Self -Haul, commercial, and <br />Industrial. These samples were sorted into the <br />appropriate waste types and categories, weighed, and the <br />results recorded in a table. <br />Mean percentages and standard deviations were <br />calculated for each waste type and category. The results <br />of the seasonal sampling were then compared with the <br />original study, using a Student's t test analysis, at the <br />90% level of confidence. A value of t was calculated and <br />compared with a critical value of t, for a two tailed <br />test, obtained from a table of Student t distribution <br />values. If t calculated was within the range of +- t <br />critical, then the differences were not statistically <br />significant at a 90% confidence level. <br />The analysis revealed that although the percentages <br />for waste types and categories were different between the <br />two studies, the differences were not significant for <br />most categories of waste. Rather than reproducing the <br />statistical tables, only the waste types that were <br />significantly different were listed in Table A 1-3. <br />Appendix 1 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.