Laserfiche WebLink
As discussed in Section 7.1.1, the worst-case flow for the geocomposite drain has been <br />estimated based on the leachate pumping rates between 2005 and 2007. A summary of <br />the pumping rate and the daily calculation is presented in Attachment F. The peak flow <br />is estimated to be approximately 1,000 gpad. Again, the trend in the pumping rates <br />shows decreasing flow with time; therefore, the flow of 1,000 gpad is very likely to be <br />the worst-case flow. <br />The flow capacity calculations are presented in Attachment F. The calculations show a <br />global factor of safety of 35.4 for the geocomposite drain, which is significantly greater <br />than the acceptable value of 2. <br />7.2 Design of Geocomposite Drain for Future Modules <br />The proposed liner system within the future modules will be similar to that used in <br />Module 4. Therefore, the geocomposite drain is used only on the sideslopes. The <br />anticipated peak flow through this geocomposite drain has been estimated based on the <br />results of HELP3 simulations. The results of the HELP simulation presented in <br />Attachment F show a peak flow of 4,660 gpad. It should be noted that the flow rates <br />predicted from HELP3 modeling are typically very conservative. <br />The required transmissivity of the geocomposite to carry a flow of 4,660 gpad (with all <br />the reduction factors and a global safety factor) is determined using the calculations <br />ispresented in Attachment F. The calculations show that the index transmissivity of the <br />geocomposite drain should be greater than 1.8 x 10-4 m2/sec at a hydraulic gradient of <br />0.33 and a normal load of 35,000 psf. This requirement should be incorporated into the <br />construction specifications for Modules 5 through 11. <br />U] <br />Geotechnical Analyses for NCRCSL Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br />Shaw Environmental, Inc. County of San Joaquin, December 12, 2007 <br />7-2 <br />