Laserfiche WebLink
Non-Water Release Corrective Action Plan <br /> North County Recycling Center and Sanitary Landfill <br /> 50 feet of the existing ground surface or if the soil materials have a minimum SPT blow count of <br /> 30 blows per foot, an analysis for liquefaction effects is not necessary. Accordingly, based on a <br /> preliminary site screening for liquefaction, the potential for liquefaction (and associated <br /> dynamic settlement) at the site is low. Accordingly, based on site-specific seismic design <br /> parameters and foundation materials strength characteristics, impacts resulting from <br /> liquefaction and associated dynamic settlement are considered negligible, and outside of the <br /> definition of a reasonably foreseeable impact. <br /> 4.1.5 Impacts from Potential Slope Failure <br /> 4.1.5.1 Slope Stability Analysis <br /> To satisfy the requirements of CalRecycle's BMPs, the existing landfill prism and cover slopes <br /> were evaluated for dynamic stability by using a horizontal PGA of 0.15g, which is greater than <br /> the predicted MCE. <br /> The Excavation Plan from Shaw (2010), the liner/cover site descriptions from Shaw (2007), and <br /> the groundwater contour map from CB&I (2013) were used as the basis to evaluate the <br /> dynamic stability of the existing landfill slopes. An evaluation of the static stability of the site <br /> slopes was not performed since it is not considered necessary for the dynamic analysis of the <br /> site per the CalRecycle guidelines. <br /> ® Groundwater levels are a minimum of 100 feet below the bottom of the waste and thus, <br /> groundwater was not considered in the stability analysis. <br /> Two cross sections were prepared to evaluate landfill refuse prism slope stability for the <br /> ultimate build-out landfill configuration (see cross section locations on Figure 2). The two <br /> chosen cross section locations were based on two cross sections with the lowest factor of <br /> safety of the six cross sections presented in Shaw (2009). The cross section locations follow: <br /> • Cross section A-A' was generated in the eastern portion of the landfill through the highest <br /> proposed portion of the landfill slope in the area of the shallowest landfill base. <br /> • Cross section B-B' was prepared through the southern portion of the landfill in the area of <br /> the highest landfill slope. <br /> 4.1.5.2 Geotechnical Parameters <br /> The soil materials existing and proposed at the site include: native foundation materials, cover <br /> soils, geosynthetic liner/slope materials, drainage materials, and municipal solid waste (MSW) <br /> fill. All the landfill modules are lined with geomembrane (HDPE) liners. <br /> Geotechnical parameters required for analysis include unit weight and shear strength <br /> parameters (angle of friction and cohesion). Strength parameters for the MSW are based on <br /> ® published information by Kavazanjian et. al., (1995). The shear strength of the slope and base <br /> 2013.A135 I N:\San Joaquin\North County\Non-Water Release CAP\Final Report\North County_NWCAP_Report_Final.docx <br /> July 2014,Rev.0 <br />