My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1988_2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_1988_2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2020 3:52:44 PM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:04:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
1988_2
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_1988_2.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
accompanied each sample. To minimize sampling exposure and potential <br /> loss of sample integrity, the number of custodians in the chain of <br /> possession was kept to a minimum. Appendix G contains all chain-of- <br /> custody records. <br /> 5.2 LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL <br /> Laboratory QC for the air quality testing program was provided by <br /> analyzing QC samples and comparing the results with the actual test <br /> data. QC control samples consisted primarily of blank samples, and <br /> spiked samples. Duplicate analysis of some samples was also conduct- <br /> ed. The results of this QC testing were used to assess the data's <br /> reproducibility, accuracy, and completeness by the methods recommended <br /> in the Guidelines. These methods and the results of the assessment <br /> are briefly described below. <br /> 5.2. 1 Data Reoroducibility <br /> Data reproducibility was evaluated by calculating the relative percent <br /> difference (RPD) of the results of replicate analyses according to the <br /> formula given in EPA Handbook for Anaivy t'Cal Quality Control in Water <br /> and Wastewater Laboratories (June 1972, Section 6) : <br /> RPD = I + x <br /> x1x2 I x 100 <br /> 1 2 <br /> where <br /> x1 = first result <br /> X2 = second result <br /> Reproducibility was calculated for each analyte in each set of dupli- <br /> cate samples. The reproducibility for each duplicated set is present- <br /> ed in Tables 8a and 8b. <br /> Of 38 duplicate pairs, the concentrations differed by more than <br /> 20 percent in 13, or in 34 percent of the data pairs. Most of these <br /> PJ9 9390304.00D 5-6 Rev. 0 09/20/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.