My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
Archived Reports
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 4:12:02 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:04:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
2007
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_2007.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thus, when the alpha level was higher than 1 percent, the concentration limit was not established <br /> and data was compared to established limits in the Waste Discharge Requirements. <br /> Nonstatistical Approach <br /> When the background data set contains 100 percent nondetect values, Sanitas applies the <br /> nonstatistical approach. This approach takes into consideration that if historically a constituent has <br /> not been detected, any detection of that constituent would be considered an exceedence. Thus, in <br /> these situations (100 percent nondetected values), the tolerance limit is set at"detect",meaning that <br /> if a value is detected above its method detection limit, this value is an exceedance of the <br /> concentration limit. <br /> Intrawell Rank Sum <br /> When Intrawell Tolerance Limit analysis is unable to normalize the data and thus a nonparametric <br /> analysis is performed, the false positive rate becomes greater than five percent. When this happens <br /> the data is compared to the concentration limit listed in the WDRs, if any. In addition, an Intrawell <br /> Rank Sum analysis is performed. This is a nonparametric procedure where the sums of ranked data <br /> sets are compared. Subsequent sample data are compared with sampling data from the initial <br /> monitoring period of the same well. It is assumed that during the initial monitoring period the well <br /> has shown no evidence of contamination nor an increasing trend. This test procedure is used to <br /> evaluate whether the historical (background data) and the compliance data have the same median <br /> constituent concentration. <br /> Trend Analysis <br /> Sen's Slope measures the change in constituent concentrations per unit time. Sen's method is not <br /> greatly affected by outliers, and the slope can be computed when data are missing. Sen's estimator <br /> is closely related to the Mann-Kendall test, which is a nonparametric rank correlation test for trend. <br /> The test uses only the relative magnitudes of the data rather than their actual values; therefore, <br /> missing values are allowed. Sen's Slope and the Mann-Kendall tests are described in"Statistical <br /> Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring,"Richard O. Gilbert, Van Nostrand Reinhold, <br /> New York, 1987. The Mann-Kendall test is recommended in"An Evaluation of Trend Detection <br /> Techniques for Use in Water Quality Monitoring Programs,"Jim Loftis, et al., (USEPA), 1989. <br /> Only data detected at least four times above its PQL are evaluated. Trace values used are the <br /> estimated values from the certified analytical reports. A trend analysis was conducted only on data <br /> collected from the point data was detected above the PQL. For the Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill, <br /> the null hypothesis is "no statistically significant trend in constituent concentrations." The null <br /> hypothesis was rejected if trends in the monitoring data were significant at alpha=0.05, which is the <br /> probability of rejecting the null hypothesis of no trend when it is true(i.e. a Type 1 error). The <br /> County uses Sanitas to calculate both the Sen's Slope and the Mann-Kendall test for trends. <br /> Corral Hollow Landfill D-2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2-Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.