Laserfiche WebLink
the eastern edge of the landfill. Refuse in this area could have an effect on water quality if <br /> rainwater in the drainage ditch were to percolate through the refuse and reach the shallow aquifer <br /> below. The results of the investigation indicated that refuse is present below the ditch, but does <br /> not extend below the road. The investigation revealed that the final closure cover did not extend <br /> over the refuse in the ditch area. Preliminary results of this investigation were transmitted to the <br /> LEA as requested. <br /> In early 2006, improving trends in water quality at MW-4 were noted, apparently beginning in late <br /> 2004 as a result of removing ponding from the drainage ditch along the east side of the landfill. <br /> In February 2006, the CIWMB required additional investigation of the closure cap and refuse on <br /> the eastern edge of the landfill footprint. <br /> In March 2006, the County formally submitted the results of the investigation and a proposed plan <br /> to upgrade and extend the closure cap adjacent to the access road to the LEA and CIWMB. The <br /> closure cap would be extended using geocomposite clay liner(GCL) <br /> In August 2006, CVRWQCB staff issued a violation for the insufficient groundwater monitoring <br /> of the shallow aquifer on the western side of the landfill; however, that aquifer does not exist. <br /> In October of 2006, the County proposed a Phase 2 investigation of the extent of closure cap, <br /> incorporating comments from the LEA and CIWMB staff received since February 2006. <br /> Amok <br /> In December 2006, CVRWQCB staff issued a violation for the presence of VOCs in groundwater <br /> at monitoring well MW-5, and directed the County to perform evaluation monitoring. <br /> In mid-January 2007, the County submitted a revised Phase 2 plan to further define the edge of <br /> closure cap and refuse along the eastern footprint edge, incorporating further comments from <br /> CIWMB and CVRWQCB staff. <br /> In late January 2007, the County submitted a proposal to increase corrective action along the <br /> eastern edge of the landfill footprint in response to the violation received in December 2006. This <br /> proposal included increase in LFG collection with a horizontal LFG collector beneath a HDPE <br /> liner along the affected footprint edge. <br /> On March 9, 2007, CVRWQCB staff issued a second violation for the presence of VOCs in <br /> groundwater at monitoring well MW-5. <br /> In March 2007 the County submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Program(EMP) work plan to the <br /> CVRWQCB further assess the nature and extent of potential off site migration of landfill gas in <br /> the vadose zone and VOCs and chloride in groundwater. The EMP includes the installation of two <br /> permanent groundwater monitoring wells, and groundwater and vadose zone soil gas sampling at <br /> nine temporary borings. <br /> Corral Hollow Landfill 3 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2n°Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 31,2007 <br />