Laserfiche WebLink
3.3.4 Assessment of the Potential for Permanent Deformation <br /> As the pseudo-static factor of safety for slopes analyzed was less than 1.5, permanent <br /> seismic displacement is expected to occur(Bray et al., 1998). <br /> Using the yield accelerations from the current analyses, seismic displacement was <br /> calculated using the Makdisi-Seed method using the lower-bound curve for a Magnitude <br /> 6.9 earthquake and peak ground acceleration of 0.56g. The results of the deformation <br /> ' analysis are presented in Section 4.1. <br /> 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> This section presents conclusions and recommendations based on the results of the static <br /> and seismic slope stability analyses performed for the Corral Hollow Landfill cap <br /> extension <br /> 4.9 Slope Stability <br /> The static factor of safety for the slope analyzed is I.S. The pseudo-static factor of safety <br /> for the section is 0.62, which is less than 1.5 and therefore required a rigorous method of <br /> analysis be used to estimate the magnitude of possible displacements. <br /> The calculatedield acceleration value is 0.154 . Using the yield acceleration of 0.154 <br /> Y g g Y g, <br /> seismic displacement was calculated using the Makdisi-Seed method using an <br /> interpolation between the lower- and middle-bound curves for Magnitude 6.5 and 7.5 <br /> earthquakes, respectively, and a peak ground acceleration in rock of 0.568. The <br /> maximum displacement is approximately 10.1 inches. A permanent displacement of 6 to <br /> 12 inches is considered as the maximum allowable limit, based on the RCRA Subtitle D <br /> (258) Seismic Design Guidance for- AluniciRal Solid Waste Landfill Facilities (U.S. <br /> Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 1995). Additionally, the design guidance <br /> document goes even further in specific reference to cover systems, and suggests that <br /> "...larger permanent deformations may be considered acceptable," due to the ease of <br /> ' accessibility for repair post-earthquake. <br /> Therefore, the results of this analysis indicate the landfill design results in stable slopes <br /> per California Code of Regulations Title 27 requirements. <br /> 4.2 Liner System Shear Strength and Testing Requirements <br /> Shaw will require that material-specific interface direct shear testing be performed prior <br /> to the start of construction. The cover liner system for the landfill cap extension should <br /> provide a minimum shear strength represented by a friction angle of 21.0 degrees(96 psf) <br /> ' for normal stresses of 250 psf. <br /> We believe this shear strength is achievable with proper selection and testing of the <br /> textured LLDPE geomembrane, GDN, geotextile, and soil components of the liner <br /> systems. However, it is important that the weakest interface shear strength be verified <br /> using direct shear testing for each of the possible interfaces in the liner system. This will <br /> consist of testing the soil to geocomposite drainage net, geocomposite drainage net to <br /> Slope Stability Analysis Corral Hollow landfill 91512612 <br /> 6 <br />