Laserfiche WebLink
southwest, which is an opposite direction to the flow in the deep aquifer. The sediments below <br /> the Corcoran Formation are dry until the deep aquifer is encountered at depths of over 300 feet. <br /> COMPLIANCE HISTORY SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater monitoring is in accordance with WDRs issued in 1989, 1994 and 2001. These <br /> WDRs require monitoring the shallow and deep aquifer on the east and west sides of the landfill, <br /> and monitoring the shallow aquifer on the east side of the landfill. The shallow aquifer is not <br /> monitored on the west side because it is found only on the east side. <br /> In 1990, deep aquifer wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 went dry due to falling water levels. <br /> In the fourth quarter of 1991,volatile organic compounds(VOCs) (Trichlorofluoromethane and <br /> Tetrachloroethene)were first detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-5 (shallow <br /> aquifer), and were confirmed in February 1992. The County believes that the presence of VOCs <br /> in MW-5 was due to landfill gas (LFG) influence. <br /> In 1995, a corrective action plan(CAP) was implemented which included the closure and final <br /> cover construction for the landfill. <br /> In 1996, closure was complete, including the installation of LFG migration monitoring wells. <br /> Monitoring of these wells indicated combustible gas above the regulatory limit of 5%. <br /> In 2001, a LFG collection system was installed as a corrective action(source removal) against <br /> VOC impacts, as well as to prevent offsite migration of LFG. Effectiveness of the LFG system <br /> is indicated by the absence of landfill gas at the perimeter monitoring wells and prevention of <br /> further VOC impacts indicated by a reduction of the number of individual constituent VOC <br /> detections (Appendix E, Tabular Summary of Historical Monitoring Data). This system is <br /> presently extracting as much LFG as possible, as indicated by the low methane concentration of <br /> the gas reaching the LFG flare station. <br /> tThe WDRs of 2001 required the installation of additional deep-aquifer monitoring wells because <br /> the deep aquifer level had lowered such that the original deep aquifer wells (MW-1, -2, and-3) <br /> no longer reached that aquifer. <br /> In 2003 deep-aquifer monitoring wells MW-6 and MW-7 were installed. Knowledge of the <br /> direction of the flow in this aquifer by monitoring the three previous deep-aquifer wells allowed <br /> these wells to be located directly up gradient and down gradient of the landfill. <br /> In 2003, an investigation of off-site contamination and the effect on water quality parameters in <br /> MW-4 was initiated due to an increasing trend in Nitrate as Nitrogen and a decreasing trend in <br /> pH. This investigation was inconclusive. <br /> In late 2003 the drainage ditch adjacent to the eastern access road was improved to reduce <br /> ponding and minimize infiltration along the ditch. <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill 2 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 1 s,Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—April 16,2012 <br />