Laserfiche WebLink
® • The PCE concentration detected at MW-11A(0.23 ug/L) is slightly above the laboratory <br /> method detection limit of 0.13 ug/L <br /> • A linear extrapolation of the 1 ug/L contour interval lines between a PCE concentration <br /> of 5.2 ug/L at MW-5 and a PCE concentration of 0.52 ug/L at MW-10A <br /> The overall shape of the PCE plume is relatively symmetrical from an apparent source located <br /> near the northern boundary of the landfill, an area that includes both County and Caltrans refuse. <br /> The source location appears to be centered between well MW-5, LFG probe GW-I, and well <br /> MW-8. The apparent western edge of VOC impacted groundwater adjacent to the landfill is the <br /> western edge of the Corcoran Clay Formation, (Figures 2 and 5). The apparent eastern edge of <br /> VOC impacted groundwater adjacent to the landfill is well SB-I, which is an apparent <br /> groundwater high elevation point in the shallow aquifer(Figure 2). The plume of impacted <br /> groundwater is elongated in the direction of groundwater flow, which is generally to the north- <br /> northeast from the landfill. <br /> A more definitive interpretation can be made after at least four monitoring events collected <br /> through at least one complete climatic cycle. The minimum amount of data for a rudimentary <br /> calculation of average VOC concentrations within the plume is also four data points. <br /> Whether the plume is increasing or decreasing cannot be determined from the limited data <br /> available. However, concentration of VOCs at the two impacted wells on site have been stable <br /> or decreasing since the installation of the LFG collection system in 2001, allowing the <br /> presumption that the plume has remained constant during that time. Data from the off-site wells <br /> (MW-9A, MW-I OA and MW-I IA) will indicate if the extent of the plume is changing with time. <br /> Deep Aquifer <br /> MW-6(Down gradient): <br /> Concentrations of all parameters were within established concentration limits where the limits <br /> could be determined (Table 2). <br /> Based on output from the Sanitas statistical software, an increasing trend is reported in the <br /> concentration of TDS and a decreasing trend is reported in the concentration of chloride this <br /> quarter(Table 3). However, the changes in concentration are very small. Report of a"trend"by <br /> Sanitas software is an artifact of the software. <br /> No VOCs were reported at this well this quarter. Other than false positives, no VOCs have been <br /> reported since Toluene was reported in 2005 when the well was first installed. These Toluene <br /> data indicate that this compound was probably introduced by the drilling company when this <br /> well was installed in 2003, but quickly reduced to "trace" in three quarters. Excluding probable <br /> contamination during well construction and compounds also found the QC blanks,no VOC has <br /> been reported in this well. Therefore,there has been no indication of impact from the landfill at <br /> this well. <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill 13 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 0 Quarter and Annual 2012 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—January 15,2013 <br />