Laserfiche WebLink
In September 2005, the County investigated to determine if refuse wase resent below the drainage <br /> g <br /> ditch,the access road, and east of the road at the eastern edge of the landfill. This investigation <br /> found refuse below the ditch and that the final closure cover did not extend to the ditch. <br /> In early 2006, improving trends in water quality(nitrate) at MW-4 were noted, apparently <br /> beginning in late 2004. The County believes that this is the result of preventing ponding from the <br /> drainage ditch along the east side of the landfill completed in late 2003. <br /> In February 2006,the California Department of Resources, Recycling, and Recovery(CalRecycle <br /> —previously CIWMB)required additional investigation of the closure cap and refuse on the <br /> eastern edge of the landfill footprint. <br /> 1 In March 2006,the County submitted the results of its investigation to CalRecycle and the Local <br /> Enforcement Agency(LEA). The County proposed to upgrade and extend the closure cap <br /> adjacent to the access road by using geocomposite clay liner(GCL) <br /> In August 2006, CVRWQCB staff issued a violation for"insufficient groundwater monitoring" of <br /> the shallow aquifer on the western side of the landfill; however, a shallow aquifer does not exist <br /> on the western side of the landfill. Although this violation was apparently mistakenly issued <br /> (there was no shallow aquifer west of the landfill)this violation has not been rescinded. <br /> In October of 2006, the County proposed a Phase 2 investigation of the extent of closure cap, <br /> incorporating comments from the LEA and CalRecycle staff received since February 2006. <br /> iIn December 2006, CVRWQCB staff issued a violation for VOCs in groundwater at monitoring <br /> well MW-5, and directed the County to perform evaluation monitoring. <br /> In mid-January 2007,the County submitted a revised Phase 2 plan to further define the edge of <br /> closure cap and refuse along the eastern footprint edge, incorporating further comments from <br /> CalRecycle and CVRWQCB staff. <br /> In late January 2007,the County submitted a proposal to increase corrective action along the <br /> eastern edge of the landfill footprint in response to the violation received in December 2006. <br /> i <br /> On March 9, 2007, CVRWQCB staff issued a second violation for the VOCs present in <br /> groundwater since 1991 at monitoring well MW-5. <br /> In March 2007,the County submitted an Evaluation Monitoring Program(EMP) work plan in <br /> response to the directive by RWQCB staff to further assess the nature and extent of potential off- <br /> site migration of landfill gas in the vadose zone, and VOCs and chloride in the shallow aquifer. <br /> The EMP included the installation of two permanent groundwater monitoring wells, and <br /> groundwater and vadose zone soil gas sampling at nine temporary borings in the shallow aquifer <br /> outside County property. <br /> 1 On August 17, 2007,the County fully delineated the extent of refuse within County property, <br /> allowing design of the closure cap over the refuse not yet provided with a closure cap. This <br /> investigation also indicated the possibility of refuse in the adjacent Caltrans property. <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill 5 Department of Public Works/Solid Waste <br /> 2 Quarter 2014 Groundwater Monitoring County of San Joaquin—July 15,2014 <br />